Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42359072›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026

Feasibility and safety of an analgesia-first strategy without hypnotic sedatives in adult patients admitted to the intensive care unit after neurosurgical craniotomy: a protocol for a single-arm, single-center exploratory prospective study.

Yu-Mei Wang, Ying Tian, Shu-Ya Wang, Guang-Qiang Chen, Guang-Zhi Shi

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06727435 (Feasibility and Safety of an Analgesia-first Strategy Without Hypnotic Sedatives in Adult Patients Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit After Neurosurgical Craniotomy), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06727435 nanot yet recruitingnot on this map

Feasibility and Safety of an Analgesia-first Strategy Without Hypnotic Sedatives in Adult Patients Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit After Neurosurgical Craniotomy: a Single-arm, Single-centre Exploratory Prospective Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorBeijing Tiantan HospitalRan2026 to 2028Enrolled65ConditionsCraniotomy, Neurosurgical PatientsArmsanalgesia-first strategy without hypnotic sedatives
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yu-Mei WangDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Ying TianDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Shu-Ya WangDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Guang-Qiang ChenDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Guang-Zhi ShiDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Postoperative neurosurgical patients often require pain management and agitation control while still being assessed for consciousness and focal neurological signs. General ICU trials suggest that minimizing the use of hypnotic sedatives may be feasible for selected mechanically ventilated patients; however, neurocritical care patients may have different safety requirements. This study aims to explore the feasibility and safety of an analgesia-first strategy, without the routine use of hypnotic sedatives, in adult patients admitted to the ICU after neurosurgical craniotomy. Methods and analysis: This is a single-center, single-arm, open-label, exploratory prospective study. A total of 65 adult patients after neurosurgical craniotomy with an anticipated ICU stay of more than 24 h and Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) score ≥ + 1 will be enrolled, provided that they do not require deep sedation. Eligible patients will receive protocolized nonpharmacological measures and remifentanil-based analgesia titrated from 0.1 to 0.2 μg/kg/min every 10-15 min to achieve a target RASS score of -2 to +1 and Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT) score of 0-1. Rescue sedation with midazolam or propofol is permitted when clinically required for safety. The primary endpoint is successful protocol management during the first 24 h after initiation, defined as absence of protocol failure caused by rescue hypnotic sedative use, sustained RASS scores outside the target range, a serious safety event requiring protocol discontinuation, or clinical deterioration. Key safety endpoints include significant agitation, accidental extubation, accidental catheter or drain removal, respiratory depression, severe hypotension or bradycardia, delirium, opioid-induced rigidity, neurological deterioration, seizures, emergent neurosurgical intervention, and urgent unplanned computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for suspected neurological worsening. Secondary endpoints include analgesic and sedative exposure, nursing workload, bispectral index (BIS) values, duration of intubation, ventilator-free days through day 28, ICU and hospital length of stay, ICU costs, pneumonia, and in-hospital mortality. Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT06727435.

Indexed as

analgesia and sedationanalgesia-firstneurosurgical craniotomyremifentanilstudy protocol

Identifiers

PMID42359072
PMCPMC13291133

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.