ReviewFrontiers in public health2026
Arts engagement and mental health: a social psychological framework.
Review in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Research on arts engagement and mental health has expanded rapidly in recent years, and a growing body of evidence suggests that participation in artistic and cultural activities is associated with improved well-being, reduced psychological distress, and stronger social connectedness. However, theoretical explanations remain insufficiently integrated. Existing studies identify a wide range of possible mechanisms, including emotional expression, stress reduction, social interaction, identity formation, and meaning-making, yet these processes are often discussed in parallel rather than synthesized within a coherent explanatory framework. In addition, the literature frequently conflates everyday arts engagement with community-based programmes and formal therapeutic interventions, making it difficult to determine what is distinctive about arts engagement as a mental health resource in ordinary social life. In response to these limitations, this article offers a conceptual review and develops a social psychological framework for understanding how arts engagement may influence mental health. It focuses primarily on everyday and community-facing forms of arts engagement in ordinary social life, while drawing selectively on therapeutic and programme-based literature to clarify conceptual boundaries and mechanisms. The article argues that arts engagement should be understood not merely as a leisure activity or cultural exposure, but as a socially organized practice through which individuals gain access to psychosocial resources. To advance this argument, it proposes a four-layer framework comprising socially scaffolded affect regulation, connectedness and belonging, social identity, collective meaning, and the social cure, and agency, recognition, and narrative repair. By integrating these processes within a single conceptual model, the article clarifies how arts engagement may influence mental health, under what conditions these effects are most likely to emerge, and why a social psychological perspective provides a valuable framework for understanding these associations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.