SynthesisFrontiers in psychology2026
Comparative effects of ball sports on executive function subdomains in children and adolescents: a network meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Ball sports interventions have been shown to yield positive effects on executive functions (EF). The aim of this study is to use network meta-analysis (NMA) to evaluate the differences in the impact of different ball sports on the subdomains of EF among children and adolescents. Methods: Five databases, including PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus, were searched up to November 2025 to identify randomized controlled trials measuring the effect of different ball sports on the subdomains of EF among children and adolescents. Paired analyses and network meta-analyses were conducted using the random-effects model. Results: This study included 12 studies with five ball sports interventions. Ball sports showed domain-specific effects on EF in children and adolescents. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) reveals that football may be a potentially effective intervention for improving the accuracy rate of inhibitory control (SUCRA = 76.69%). For working memory, ball sports did not consistently enhance accuracy, with the control condition showing the highest ranking (SUCRA = 80.93%). In contrast, tennis exhibited the greatest likelihood of improving reaction time (SUCRA = 99.99%). Table tennis may be a potentially effective intervention for improving reaction time of cognitive flexibility (SUCRA = 99.97%). Sensitivity analyses restricted to typically developing samples revealed notable changes in network structures and SUCRA rankings for inhibitory control accuracy, inhibitory control reaction time, and cognitive flexibility accuracy. Conclusion: Different ball sports demonstrated varying effects across executive function subdomains. However, the findings for inhibitory control and cognitive flexibility were highly dependent on sample composition and lacked robustness, whereas those for working memory were relatively stable. Due to limited evidence and high heterogeneity, the results should be interpreted with caution. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251038836.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.