ArticleFrontiers in surgery2026
Development and validation of a nomogram model for predicting the risk of failed manual reduction in distal radius fractures.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To develop a nomogram model for predicting the risk of failed manual reduction in patients with distal radius fractures (DRF) and to validate its predictive performance. Methods: A total of 822 patients with DRF were retrospectively reviewed and divided into two groups based on the success or failure of manual reduction. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify independent risk factors. Variables with Results: Eight independent risk factors were incorporated into the predictive model. The receiver operating characteristic curve showed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.878 (95% CI: 0.855-0.901), with a sensitivity of 75.4%, a specificity of 82.5%, and a Youden's index of 0.579. The calibration curve demonstrated good agreement between predicted and observed probabilities, with a mean absolute error of 0.005 after bootstrap internal validation (1,000 iterations). Conclusion: The independent risk factors for failure of manual reduction were determined to be AO classification, severity of swelling, etiology of the fracture, time from injury to reduction, pre-reduction palmar tilt angle, radial shortening height, pre-reduction ulnar deviation angle, and a history of alcohol consumption. The nomogram model constructed based on these factors demonstrates high predictive accuracy for the risk of failed manual reduction in DRF. It has the potential to assist clinicians in more accurately assessing individual patient risk, thereby providing valuable guidance for personalized treatment strategies and clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.