Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42359328›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in surgery2026

Development and validation of a nomogram model for predicting the risk of failed manual reduction in distal radius fractures.

Mingyue Fan, Binbin Gu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mingyue FanFuyang Cancer Hospital, Fuyang, China.
Binbin GuFuyang Cancer Hospital, Fuyang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To develop a nomogram model for predicting the risk of failed manual reduction in patients with distal radius fractures (DRF) and to validate its predictive performance. Methods: A total of 822 patients with DRF were retrospectively reviewed and divided into two groups based on the success or failure of manual reduction. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify independent risk factors. Variables with Results: Eight independent risk factors were incorporated into the predictive model. The receiver operating characteristic curve showed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.878 (95% CI: 0.855-0.901), with a sensitivity of 75.4%, a specificity of 82.5%, and a Youden's index of 0.579. The calibration curve demonstrated good agreement between predicted and observed probabilities, with a mean absolute error of 0.005 after bootstrap internal validation (1,000 iterations). Conclusion: The independent risk factors for failure of manual reduction were determined to be AO classification, severity of swelling, etiology of the fracture, time from injury to reduction, pre-reduction palmar tilt angle, radial shortening height, pre-reduction ulnar deviation angle, and a history of alcohol consumption. The nomogram model constructed based on these factors demonstrates high predictive accuracy for the risk of failed manual reduction in DRF. It has the potential to assist clinicians in more accurately assessing individual patient risk, thereby providing valuable guidance for personalized treatment strategies and clinical decision-making.

Indexed as

AO classificationdistal radius fracturemanual reductionnomogramrisk factors

Identifiers

PMID42359328
PMCPMC13293576

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.