ReviewUrologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2026
[Prevention instead of remediation-screening, lifestyle factors, and prostate care 2.0-transition of urology to healthcare coach : Holistic approach to prostate health].
Review in Urologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEstablishment of an organized, risk-adapted prostate cancer screening program in Germany could serve as a key entry point for preventive men's health.
objectivesHow can the introduction of an organized, risk-adapted prostate cancer screening program in Germany shape preventive urology of the future? MATERIALS AND
methodsThis narrative review article is based on guidelines and expert consensus supported by a literature search in PubMed. The cited studies represent the most relevant work on this topic and were selected to illustrate developments and fundamental concepts; however, completeness is not claimed.
resultsSerum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels and prostate MRI not only identify patients at increased risk for prostate cancer but also offer insights into other urological conditions, such as lower urinary tract symptoms and hypogonadism. In analogy to other early detection strategies, PSA testing at the age of 45-50 years could serve as a simple triage test to guide risk-adapted follow-up and timely referral to urological care. Lifestyle factors-including regular physical activity, a balanced diet, and pelvic floor training-may favorably influence urological health and related outcomes. While organized prostate cancer screening has already been shown to improve cancer-specific mortality to a level comparable to mammography, a more holistic approach may further enhance its overall benefit.
conclusionUrology has significant opportunities to actively promote healthy behaviors among aging men. The establishment of an organized prostate cancer screening program provides an ideal entry point for this purpose. Modern screening concepts should incorporate holistic health promotion for aging men alongside direct oncological endpoints.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42360421What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.