ArticleIrish journal of medical science2026
Baseline five-times sit-to-stand and functional reach were associated with falls in adults aged 50 years and older in Saudi Arabia: a nine-month prospective cohort study.
Article in Irish journal of medical science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsTo examine the association between baseline physical performance measures with retrospective baseline fall and fall frequency and prospective falls.
methodsThis prospective study included community adults aged ≥ 50 years. Outcomes included retrospective baseline fall history and frequency, and prospective fall and fall frequency at the 4-5- and 8-9-month follow-up. Baseline measures included the 5-Times Sit-to-Stand (5xSTS[s]), Functional Reach Test (FRT[cm]), 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT[m]), 10-Meter Walk Test (10-MWT[m]), and Timed-Up and Go (TUG[s]).
resultsOf 211 participants, 12.3% reported ≥ 1 retrospective baseline falls. During the prospective follow-up, 8.8% and 14.1% reported falls at 4-5 and 8-9 months. Slower 5xSTS was associated with the retrospective baseline fall (OR:1.07, p = 0.001) and prospective falls at 8-9 months (OR: 1.07, p = 0.004). A shorter FRT was associated with retrospective baseline fall history (OR: 0.96, p = 0.034) and prospective falls at 4-5 (OR: 0.94, p < 0.001) and 8-9 months (OR: 0.97, p = 0.042). Slower 5xSTS was associated with higher retrospective baseline fall frequency (IRR:1.06, p = 0.001) and prospective fall frequency at 8-9 months (IRR: 1.06, p < 0.001). Shorter FRT was associated with retrospective baseline fall frequency (IRR: 0.97, p = 0.04) and prospective fall frequency at 4-5 months (IRR: 0.95, p < 0.001).
conclusionPoor 5xSTS performance was associated with retrospective baseline fall history and prospective falls at 8-9 months. Decreased FRT was associated with retrospective baseline fall history and prospective falls at all time points, whereas its association with fall frequency was limited to retrospective baseline and prospective falls at 4-5 months.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42360606What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.