Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42360682›Full record

ArticleMolecular ecology resources2026

A Practical Framework for GT-Seq Panel Optimization.

Chandika Rg, Caitlin N Ott-Conn, Peter T Euclide, Julie A Blanchong, Angela Schmoldt, Randy W DeYoung, Daniel P Walsh, Wes A Larson, Emily K Latch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular ecology resources, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Chandika RgDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-2294-1395
Caitlin N Ott-ConnWildlife Division, Michigan Department of Natural Resources, Marquette, Michigan, USA.
Peter T EuclideO'Neill School of Environmental and Public Affairs, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1212-0435
Julie A BlanchongDepartment of Natural Resource Ecology and Management, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, USA.
Angela SchmoldtSchool of Freshwater Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.
Randy W DeYoungCaesar Kleberg Wildlife Research Institute, Texas A&M University-Kingsville, Kingsville, Texas, USA.
Daniel P WalshUSGS Montana Cooperative Wildlife Research Unit, Missoula, Montana, USA.
Wes A LarsonNOAA Alaska Fisheries Science Center, Auke Bay Laboratories, Juneau, Alaska, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4473-3401
Emily K LatchDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.

Funding

Multistate Conservation Grant Program F22AP00694-00the Michigan Department of Natural Resources/Michigan State University Joint Wildlife Disease Initiative 107048 MSUUW-Milwaukee Graduate School
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genotyping-in-thousands by sequencing (GT-seq) panels are powerful tools in ecological, evolutionary and conservation genomics, yet the optimization process critical for robust and reproducible genotyping remains poorly formalized. Here, we present an iterative workflow for GT-seq panel optimization that emphasizes systematic refinement, quality control and structured decision-making to improve panel performance across diverse populations and study contexts. We illustrate this framework through the development and optimization of a GT-seq panel for white-tailed deer, a widely distributed and ecologically important North American species. From an initial set of 1200 candidate SNPs selected from a commercial microarray (OVSNP60, containing 72,728 SNPs) and prioritized for high heterozygosity, primers were designed for 646 loci. The final optimized panel contains 508 high-performing markers retained after iterative removal of overamplifying primer pairs, adjustment of primer concentrations, PCR conditions and bioinformatic filtering. The overall proportion of SNPs with more than 70% genotype rate increased from 25.5% in the first optimization round to 87.8% in the final round. Consequently, the overall genotype rate increased from 39.4% to 84%. We also identify key quality-control checkpoints and practical criteria to guide panel refinement and ensure consistent performance. By prioritizing optimization as an integral component of GT-seq panel development, this work provides a reproducible framework for generating robust, high-throughput genotyping tools in non-model species and underscores the importance of iterative refinement to maximize data quality and utility.

Indexed as

DeerGenotyping TechniquesHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingAnimalsComputational BiologyDNA PrimersPolymorphism, Single NucleotideSequence Analysis, DNADNA Primersgenetic resourceGTseqGT‐seq panel optimizationheterozygositymultipurpose panel developmentOdocoileus virginianusOVSNP60population geneticsSNPsWTD GT‐seq panel

Identifiers

PMID42360682
PMCPMC13308542

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.