Trial reportJAMA network open2026
Heart Failure Medication Withdrawal in Patients With Improved Cardiac Function After Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: The DEFINITION-AF Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial.
Trial report in JAMA network open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Withdrawal of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) for heart failure (HF) is common after atrial fibrillation (AF) catheter ablation and recovery of cardiac function, but safety remains uncertain. Objective: To assess the feasibility and safety of phased GDMT withdrawal in patients with AF with highly suspected AF-mediated cardiomyopathy after catheter ablation. Design, Setting, and Participants: This open-label pilot randomized clinical trial included adult patients who were enrolled and randomized from April 13, 2023, to September 19, 2024, at Beijing Anzhen Hospital, China, with a 6-month follow-up. Eligible patients were those with suspected AF-mediated cardiomyopathy at 3 months after ablation, defined by sinus rhythm at 3 months after ablation, absence of other suspected cardiomyopathies, improvement of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) from 45% or less to 55% or more, normalized LV end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD), N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels less than 250 ng/L, and no HF symptoms or signs. Interventions: Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to phased GDMT withdrawal or GDMT continuation. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was HF deterioration, defined as LVEF decline more than 10% to less than 55%, LVEDD increase more than 10% and beyond normal, NT-proBNP levels doubling to more than 400 ng/L, or worsening HF signs or symptoms. Secondary outcomes included cardiovascular events, changes in echocardiographic and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) parameters, NT-proBNP levels, Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire-12 (KCCQ-12) scores, atrial arrhythmia recurrence, and adverse drug events. Results: Among 50 patients enrolled and randomized, 47 completed follow-up (median [IQR] age, 56.0 [48.0-60.5] years; 37 males [78.7%]), including 23 (48.9%) in the GDMT withdrawal group and 24 (51.1%) in the continuation group. HF deterioration occurred in 3 patients with GDMT withdrawal (13.0%) and 0 with GDMT continuation (0%) (P = .11). Early GDMT reinitiation in 3 patients with HF deterioration showed recovery of LVEF or NT-proBNP. No cardiovascular events occurred. Median (IQR) echocardiographic (LVEF: 0% [-3.0% to 3.5%] vs 1.5% [-5.0% to 5.0%]), CMR (LVEF: -2.1% [-7.2% to 4.6%] vs 2.9% [-2.6% to 7.4%]), and KCCQ-12 score (0 [0 to 0.5] vs 0) changes were similar between groups. Median (IQR) NT-proBNP levels declined more in the GDMT continuation group than the withdrawal group (-25.7 [-33.6 to -6.7] pg/mL vs 2.7 [-21.4 to 24.2] pg/mL; P = .03). Adverse drug events were more frequent in the GDMT continuation group than the withdrawal group (5 [20.8%] vs 0 [0%]; P = .050). Arrhythmia recurrence rates were comparable (GDMT withdrawal: 3 [13.0%] vs continuation: 3 [12.5%]). Conclusions and Relevance: In this pilot randomized clinical trial of carefully selected patients with AF with normalized cardiac function and sinus rhythm after catheter ablation, 13% of patients with GDMT withdrawal experienced HF deterioration, whereas drug-related complications were more common in the continuation group, suggesting that further studies are needed to determine whether GDMT can be safely discontinued in this population. Trial Registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry Identifier: ChiCTR2300077439.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.