ArticleGenome biology and evolution2026
A Reassessment of Positive Growth Effects of Expressed Random Sequence Clones in E. coli Suggests Direct Adaptive Functions.
Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
De novo gene emergence from noncoding sequences is an important evolutionary mechanism, yet the functional potential of random sequences remains debated. Previous experiments suggested that expression of random sequence clones in Escherichia coli can enhance the growth of cells, ie they can provide a direct fitness advantage. However, these findings have been questioned, regarding potential confounding effects of the clone mixtures and a possibly negatively acting peptide expressed from the cloning vector. Here, we performed controlled competitive growth assays using a defined subset of random sequence clones representing a spectrum of fitness effects. Experiments across multiple conditions, including two different growth cycle durations, induction states, and replicate sets, showed high technical reproducibility and consistent clone-specific growth trajectories for the majority of the clones, but for some, also influences of genomic background and experimental conditions. While previous results for vector-derived control constructs could be confirmed, several random sequence clones exhibited higher positive selection coefficients than these vector constructs. These relative effects persisted even when negative clones were excluded, indicating that they are not driven by competition dynamics with negative clones. Our results demonstrate that positive growth effects of random sequence clones cannot be explained by clone mixture and vector artifacts alone. Instead, a subset of random sequences confers genuine fitness advantages comparable to beneficial mutations observed in experimental evolution studies. These findings provide experimental support for the capacity of random sequences to directly generate adaptive effects without the necessity to acquire additional adaptive mutations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.