Evidence mapPaperPMID 42360910Full record

ArticleAnnals of nutrition & metabolism2026

Trends in the Use of Anamorelin Hydrochloride for Cancer Cachexia: Examining the Timing of Anamorelin Initiation.

Matoka Okamoto, Koji Karasawa, Masahiro Chiba

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of nutrition & metabolism, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Matoka OkamotoDivision of Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism, Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Showa Medical University School of Pharmacy, Tokyo, Japan, matoka.o@cmed.showa-u.ac.jp.
Koji KarasawaDivision of Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism, Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Showa Medical University School of Pharmacy, Tokyo, Japan.
Masahiro ChibaDivision of Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism, Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Showa Medical University School of Pharmacy, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCancer cachexia is a clinically important condition associated with worsening nutritional status and difficulty in continuing anticancer treatment. Although multimodal approaches combining exercise, nutritional support, and pharmacological treatment may improve symptoms and delay disease progression, the optimal timing of pharmacological intervention remains unclear. Conventional diagnostic criteria have largely been based on Western populations and may not adequately identify patients at an earlier stage in Asian populations. In 2023, the Asian Working Group for Cachexia (AWGC) proposed diagnostic criteria more suitable for Asian populations; however, it remains unclear to what extent this change has been reflected in real-world prescribing practices for anamorelin. In this study, we examined the anamorelin prescribing trends before and after the introduction of the AWGC criteria and evaluated the associations of cachexia stage and baseline performance status (PS) with treatment continuation.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective chart review of patients who received anamorelin between April 2021 and March 2025 at Showa Medical University Hospital and Showa Medical University Northern Yokohama Hospital. The primary outcome was the duration of treatment continuation. Secondary evaluation focused on chronological changes in the PS. Prescribing patterns before and after the introduction of the AWGC criteria were compared, and subgroup analyses were performed according to Fearon's classification and baseline PS.

resultsOf 130 patients prescribed anamorelin during the study period, data from 98 were included in the final analysis after exclusions. Overall, 68 and 30 patients were classified into the pre-AWGC and post-AWGC groups, respectively, with no major differences in key background characteristics or clear changes in the prescribing patterns between the groups. According to Fearon's classification, 90 and 8 patients had cachexia and pre-cachexia, respectively. The pre-cachexia group exhibited a significantly longer continuation duration than did the cachexia group (median: 211.5 vs. 34.5 days, log-rank p = 0.013). Patients with baseline PS of 0-1 demonstrated a significantly longer continuation duration than did those with a PS of 2-4 (median 71 vs. 25 days, log-rank p < 0.001). No marked deterioration in the PS over time was observed.

conclusionThe prescribing patterns of anamorelin did not substantially change after the introduction of the AWGC criteria. Conversely, longer treatment continuation was observed in patients at an earlier stage of cachexia and in those with preserved baseline PS. Thus, in addition to updated diagnostic criteria, earlier intervention and initiation at a stage with better general condition may be important when optimizing the timing of anamorelin treatment.

Indexed as

AnamorelinCancer cachexiaClinical nutritionPerformance statusRetrospective study

Identifiers

PMID42360910
PMCPMC13446887

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.