ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2026
Feasibility of image-based 3D avatar anthropometry assessment of pediatric obesity: a pilot study.
Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the feasibility and validity of 3D avatar-based anthropometry for assessing anthropometric indicators of overweight and obesity in children based on artificial intelligence-derived 3D body reconstruction. This cross-sectional study included 171 children aged 8-10 years from five primary schools in southern Spain. Due to technical constraints of the reconstruction software, 75 children meeting predefined image quality and body weight requirements (≥ 30 kg) were eligible for 3D avatar analysis. Manual anthropometric measurements were obtained following International Society for the Advancement of Kinanthropometry (ISAK) standards and compared with avatar-derived circumferences. Agreement was assessed by using Wilcoxon tests, Spearman correlations, Bland-Altman analyses, and false discovery rate-adjusted comparisons. Avatar-derived circumferences were consistently greater than manual measurements, although waist-to-hip and waist-to-stature ratios demonstrated no significant differences. Avatar and manual circumferences were moderately to strongly correlated (Spearman's ρ = 0.62-0.72; adjusted p < 0.05). However, the mean absolute errors ranged from 6.21 to 7.11 cm, and Bland-Altman analysis revealed systematic overestimation with wide limits of agreement, particularly for waist and hip circumferences. Despite these discrepancies, both methods similarly discriminated between weight status categories.
conclusionImage-based 3D avatar anthropometry is a feasible, noninvasive approach for population-level screening and research in pediatric settings. Although the system reliably captures relative differences and body proportions, its current accuracy is insufficient for individual-level clinical assessment. Further algorithmic refinement and validation in lighter and more diverse pediatric populations are needed before clinical implementation. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Childhood obesity remains a major public health challenge requiring accurate monitoring. • Anthropometric assessment still relies mainly on manual measurements, while AI-based 3D body modeling offers a promising non-invasive alternative. WHAT IS NEW: • Image-based 3D avatar anthropometry is feasible in school settings but is constrained by technical requirements. • Avatar measurements are correlated with manual anthropometry and preserve weight status discrimination but demonstrate systematic overestimation and limited agreement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42362956What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.