ReviewDiabetologia2026
SARS-CoV-2 and diabetes: a post-pandemic reappraisal.
Review in Diabetologia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic was a dynamic and often confusing period for clinical and biomedical research. As severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) spread globally, knowledge accumulated rapidly through publications that were frequently based on preliminary or sometimes conflicting evidence, yet these papers played a critical role in shaping evolving medical, research and societal responses. Early in the pandemic, diabetes emerged as one of the strongest predictors of severe COVID-19 outcomes and mortality, placing it at the centre of early risk-stratification and therapeutic frameworks and prompting urgent efforts to understand the biological basis of these associations. As the pandemic progressed, reports of new-onset diabetes following COVID-19 infection raised the possibility of a bidirectional relationship between SARS-CoV-2 infection and diabetes. In this review, we provide a post-pandemic reappraisal of the clinical and experimental literature examining the intersection of COVID-19 and diabetes. We summarise proposed pathophysiological mechanisms, including the effects of SARS-CoV-2 infection in the pancreas and on peripheral insulin-sensitive tissues. We review key meta-analyses assessing the association between COVID-19 and incident type 1 and type 2 diabetes and highlight strengths and weaknesses of the epidemiologic studies underpinning these findings. We highlight the highest-quality evidence from prospective cohorts, as well as relevant clinical trials and registry-based studies that emerged from this collective experience. We discuss emerging relationships between long COVID and diabetes and the effect of vaccination on diabetes risk following SARS-CoV-2 infection. Finally, we identify critical knowledge gaps and outline priorities for ongoing and future studies needed to resolve remaining uncertainties.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.