ArticleBMC veterinary research2026
Clustering of sperm by chromatin integrity features reveals breed and monthly effects, as well as a link between double-strand DNA breaks and litter size in pigs.
Article in BMC veterinary research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIdentifying sperm biomarkers that predict fertility in swine is important for improving animal selection and production. In this context, however, sperm chromatin in swine remains understudied, and whether it varies by breed and season remains unresolved. Additionally, the impact of sperm chromatin protamination, condensation, and DNA integrity on reproductive outcomes (farrowing rate and litter size) is unclear in swine. This study aimed to improve the understanding of sperm chromatin features by evaluating breed- and month-related differences and determining their influence on fertility outcomes. To this end, we evaluated sperm chromatin protamination and condensation, as well as global and double-strand DNA damage, in 91 ejaculates from 41 boars (25 Landrace and 16 Large White) using chromomycin A3, dibromobimane, and alkaline and neutral Comet assays, respectively.
resultsSingle sperm analysis revealed six clusters associated with chromatin protamination, four clusters related to chromatin condensation, and two clusters corresponding to global DNA damage. Differences between the Landrace and Large White breeds were observed in the percentage of sperm with global DNA damage (P = 0.015), and in chromatin protamination (P = 0.012) and condensation (P < 0.001). Overall, sperm chromatin integrity was better in Large White than in Landrace boars. Monthly analysis revealed that sperm chromatin quality worsened in September due to an increase in global DNA damage (P < 0.01), affecting condensation in one cluster and sperm protamination in two clusters (P < 0.05). Finally, multivariate analysis showed that the percentage of sperm with double-strand DNA breaks was associated with litter size in both breeds.
conclusionsThis study identified sperm subpopulations based on chromatin features in swine. Differences were observed between Large White and Landrace breeds, with the sperm from Large White boars having healthier chromatin quality in terms of DNA damage, protamination, and condensation. Monthly variations were also seen, primarily in relation to global DNA damage. Finally, our study showed an association between the incidence of sperm with double-strand DNA breaks and litter size in both breeds.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.