ArticleMedicine2026
Migraine is not a risk factor for glaucoma: Evidence from a bidirectional Mendelian randomization study.
Article in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Numerous compelling observational studies have indicated that migraine is a risk factor for the development of glaucoma. Nevertheless, some studies have observed entirely opposite results. The objective of our research is to evaluate the potential relationship between migraine and glaucoma by employing a bidirectional Mendelian Randomization (MR) approach. This method enables us to rigorously assess the causal links between these 2 conditions, thereby addressing the discrepancies in existing literature. Independent genetic variants associated with glaucoma and migraine at the genome-wide significance level were selected as instrumental variables. All summary data were obtained from the genome-wide association study database. The primary method employed in the bidirectional MR analysis was the inverse variance weighted method, while sensitivity analyses utilized the leave-one-out method, MR-Egger method, and MR-Pleiotropy RESidual Sum and Outlier method. When migraine and its subtypes (specifically migraine with aura and migraine without aura) were evaluated as exposure factors, we found no evidence of a causal relationship with glaucoma and its subtypes (namely angle-closure glaucoma and open-angle glaucoma). Subsequently, in the reverse MR analysis, when glaucoma and its subtypes (angle-closure glaucoma and open-angle glaucoma) were assessed as exposure factors, there was no substantial evidence to support a causal relationship with migraine or its subtypes (migraine with aura and migraine without aura). Furthermore, sensitivity analyses also reinforced the robustness of our bidirectional MR findings. Our bidirectional MR analysis mitigates the biases associated with traditional observational studies, highlighting that there is no direct causal relationship between migraine and the risk of glaucoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.