SynthesisThe Journal of international medical research2026
Regional versus general anesthesia for femur and hip fracture surgery: A meta-analysis of postoperative outcomes and complications.
Synthesis in The Journal of international medical research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
ObjectiveHip and femur fractures in older adults are linked to high morbidity, mortality, and socioeconomic costs. This meta-analysis compares regional anesthesia and general anesthesia for these surgeries, focusing on perioperative safety and outcomes.MethodsFifteen studies (6829 participants) from 2009 to 2024 were analyzed. Primary outcomes included 30-day mortality, postoperative delirium, and cardiovascular events; secondary outcomes covered intraoperative blood loss, hospital stay, and pain. Pooled effect sizes were calculated using random-effects models with odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.