ArticleThe Journal of international medical research2026
Monitoring and analysis of drug therapy in a patient with drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms syndrome caused by pantoprazole: A case report.
Article in The Journal of international medical research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) syndrome is a severe T-cell-mediated adverse cutaneous reaction characterized by rash, fever, and visceral involvement following prolonged drug use. It is rarely induced by proton pump inhibitors, with no prior reports documenting pharmacist-identified pantoprazole-related DRESS syndrome and subsequent intervention. A female in her early 60s (Han Chinese ethnicity) was admitted to the intensive care unit of Xiangtan Central Hospital (Xiangtan, China) in mid-2024 for thoracoabdominal pain caused by a fall, and pantoprazole was initiated for stress ulcer prophylaxis on the hospital day 2. Twenty-six days after pantoprazole initiation, the patient developed diffuse macular erythema with desquamation, and her eosinophil percentage increased from 0.5% to 7.8% after 2 days of rash onset. The clinical pharmacist initially suspected meropenem hypersensitivity and recommended discontinuation of this agent; however, 5 days after the onset of rash, leucopenia was observed with the eosinophil percentage peaking at 18.4%, and subsequent discontinuation of pantoprazole resulted in defervescence within 48 h, gradual resolution of the rash, and normalization of blood counts within approximately 10 days of drug cessation. Despite the complex pathophysiology and diagnostic challenges associated with DRESS syndrome, the pharmacist's identification of the suspected drug and targeted intervention achieved favorable outcomes, providing clinical reference for further research on DRESS syndrome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.