ArticleJournal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders2026
Automated computed tomography quantification of iliofemoral venous arc length demonstrates left-sided predominance and sex-specific variation.
Article in Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveIn treatment planning for iliac venous obstruction, iliofemoral venous anatomy is central to procedural planning, but population-level reference data on venous arc length are limited. Arc length, the distance measured along the three-dimensional vessel centerline, reflects the longitudinal course a device must traverse, and is therefore relevant to stent length selection and implant coverage. We used automated computed tomography segmentation and centerline generation to characterize iliofemoral venous arc length and evaluated variation by laterality, age, and sex.
methodsIn this retrospective study, a machine learning (nnU-Net-based) pipeline was used to segment iliofemoral vessels from participant computed tomography scans. Three-dimensional centerlines were generated from these segmentations, and iliofemoral arc length was measured from the iliocaval confluence or aortic bifurcation to the common femoral venous confluence or common femoral bifurcation (encompassing common iliac, external iliac, and common femoral veins/arteries). After quality control and exclusion of patients <25 years, bilateral venous centerlines were available in 711 patients. Right-left arc length differences were compared within patients using paired t-tests. Arterial arc lengths were quantified for comparison. Multivariable linear regression evaluated the relationship between arc length and core covariates such as age, height, and sex.
resultsAmong adults with bilateral venous measurements, iliofemoral venous arc length was 14.8 mm greater on the left side than the right [95% confidence interval (CI), 13.9-15.6; P < .001] corresponding to +7.6% side difference. Height was strongly positively associated with venous arc length (+8.2 mm/10 cm; 95% CI, 7.1-9.3; P < .001). After adjusting for age and height, females had significantly longer venous arc length than males (+5.9 mm; 95% CI, 3.5-8.4; P < .001), with a more pronounced effect on the left side than the right (+7.9 vs +4.4 mm; P < .001). Increased age was associated with a modest decrease in venous arc length (-1.1 mm/decade; 95% CI, -1.8 to -0.4; P = .002).
conclusionsIn this large-scale morphometric study, iliofemoral venous arc length demonstrates meaningful variation by laterality, height, age, and sex, with left-sided predominance and longer height-adjusted venous arc length in females. These population-level reference data suggest that laterality and sex-specific differences may be relevant when considering venous intervention planning, device working length, and stent coverage decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.