ArticleNature communications2026
Prediction error correlates in the striosome-dopamine circuit emerge from information gain.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The striosome compartments in the striatum gate cortical inputs to dopamine neurons, which then feed back to the striosomes and surrounding matrix. This loop underlies decision-making, learning, and movement. Dopamine signals strongly correlate with reward prediction errors (RPEs) in certain tasks. However, many dopaminergic responses, such as to high costs, novelty, aversive stimuli, and real-time movement guidance, do not align with RPE. Separately, information theory explains how dopamine responds to uncertainty and encodes when rewards are expected to occur. Here, we show that apparent RPE correlations arise mathematically from the information gain of the policy of actions (policy-IG). Policy-IG quantifies how much newly arriving information changes choice. In simple reward tasks, policy-IG reduces to classic RPEs, but it also predicts dopamine responses to aversive events, nonlinear reward scaling, novelty, movement, state valuation, and moment-by-moment decision control. Thus, RPE could be a special case of this more general function. We show that policy-IG is mathematically related to a range of information-centric, Bayesian, active inference, and casual association models, allowing those models to formally incorporate the experimental RPE literature in their support. Simulating impaired policy-IG replicates basal ganglia disorder features, suggesting policy-IG as a target for therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.