Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42365050›Full record

ArticleScientific data2026

Tephritid26: A standardized, multi-angle image dataset of quarantine-significant true fruit flies for deep learning-based identification.

Zitao Li, Xinkai Wang, Zhuojie Wu, Mengyuan Yong, Marc De Meyer, Kostas Bourtzis, Bingbing Wei, Tianyu Zheng, Qian Zeng, Jin Mo and 11 more

Abstract readDataset
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific data, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Zitao LiState Key Laboratory of Agricultural and Forestry Biosecurity, College of Plant Protection, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China.
Xinkai WangState Key Laboratory of Agricultural and Forestry Biosecurity, College of Plant Protection, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China.
Zhuojie WuSchool of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, The University of Queensland St Lucia, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia.
Mengyuan YongDepartment of Entomology, College of Plant Protection, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China.
Marc De MeyerRoyal Museum for Central Africa, Invertebrates Section and JEMU, Tervuren, B3080, Belgium.
Kostas BourtzisInsect Pest Control Section, Joint FAO/IAEA Centre of Nuclear Techniques in Food and Agriculture, Department of Nuclear Sciences and Applications, International Atomic Energy Agency, P.O. Box 100, 1400, Vienna, Austria.
Bingbing WeiCollege of Plant Science & Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, China.
Tianyu ZhengState Key Laboratory of Agricultural and Forestry Biosecurity, College of Plant Protection, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China.
Qian ZengTechnology Center of Mengla Customs, Mengla, 666300, China.
Jin MoTechnology Center of Changsha Customs District, Changsha, 410004, China.
Ruosi LiuScience and Technology Research Center of China Customs, Beijing, 100026, China.
Agus SusantoPest Laboratory, Department of Plant Pest and Disease, Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Padjadjaran, Ir. Soekarno Street Km. 21, Jatinangor, Sumedang Regency, 45363, Indonesia.
Weiqi LiuTechnology Center of Manzhouli Customs District, Manzhouli, 021400, China.
Wenchao GuoKey Laboratory of Integrated Pest Management on Crops in Northwestern Oasis, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, National Plant Protection Scientific Observation and Experiment Station of Korla, Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Agricultural Biosafety, Institute of Plant Protection, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Urumqi, 830091, China.
Xinhua DingKey Laboratory of Integrated Pest Management on Crops in Northwestern Oasis, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, National Plant Protection Scientific Observation and Experiment Station of Korla, Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Agricultural Biosafety, Institute of Plant Protection, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Urumqi, 830091, China.
Xiaolei HuangState Key Laboratory of Agricultural and Forestry Biosecurity, College of Plant Protection, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, 350002, China.
Ding YangState Key Laboratory of Agricultural and Forestry Biosecurity, College of Plant Protection, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China.
Daifeng ChengDepartment of Entomology, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, 510640, China.
Xin YuSchool of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, The University of Queensland St Lucia, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia.
Fan JiangInstitute of Plant Safety and Quality, Chinese Academy of Quality and Inspection & Testing, Beijing, 100176, China. f-jiang@outlook.com.
Xuankun LiState Key Laboratory of Agricultural and Forestry Biosecurity, College of Plant Protection, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China. xuankun.li@cau.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0622-2064

Funding

Joint Research Program of State Key Laboratory of Agricultural and Forestry Biosecurity SKLJRP2509National Natural Science Foundation of China 32500393
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate and rapid identification of quarantine-significant tephritids is critical to global agricultural biosecurity, but the application of deep learning is limited by the lack of large public image datasets. We present Tephritid26, a multi-angle image dataset of 26 tephritid species to address this gap. The dataset includes 38,081 images from 1,473 specimens across seven genera and two subfamilies, assembled through a global collaborative effort to source these regulated species. Specimens were mounted using a novel protocol combining varied thoracic attachment points and pin angles, and a rotational imaging setup then systematically captured each specimen from multiple perspectives to mimic real inspection conditions. The dataset is formatted for machine learning workflows. To demonstrate its utility, we trained deep learning models for species identification. ResNet-50, ConvNeXt-B, Vit-Small and Swin-Tiny all attained high species-level accuracy (Macro-Averaged F1-score > 96.75). Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mapping confirmed that the models focused on taxonomically informative morphological regions. This dataset serves as a benchmark for developing automated identification tools in phytosanitary applications.

Indexed as

Deep LearningTephritidaeAnimalsImage Processing, Computer-AssistedQuarantine

Identifiers

PMID42365050
PMCPMC13586161

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.