Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42365182›Full record

ArticleJournal of artificial organs : the official journal of the Japanese Society for Artificial Organs2026

A potential survival benefit in coronary artery bypass grafting with micro-axial temporary pump recovery in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction.

Anjeli Reyes Macaranas, Naoki Tadokoro, George T Tolis, Sary F Aranki, Asishana A Osho, Thoralf M Sundt, Eriberto Michel, David A D'Alessandro, Akinobu Itoh

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of artificial organs : the official journal of the Japanese Society for Artificial Organs, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Anjeli Reyes MacaranasDivision of Cardiac Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Naoki TadokoroDivision of Cardiac Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
George T TolisDivision of Cardiac Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Sary F ArankiDivision of Cardiac Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Asishana A OshoDivision of Cardiac Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Thoralf M SundtDivision of Cardiac Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Eriberto MichelDivision of Cardiac Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
David A D'AlessandroDivision of Cardiac Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Akinobu ItohDivision of Cardiac Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. aitoh@bwh.harvard.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3049-3411

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with temporary micro-axial ventricular assist device (Impella, Johnson and Johnson, Danvers, MA, USA) for peri-operative recovery has been utilized among patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). We hypothesized that Impella recovery CABG would be associated with increased two-year survival, compared to traditional intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) recovery CABG. 151 patients with low LVEF (≤ 25%) underwent on-pump CABG at our hospital system between July 2017 and March 2025. Patients who underwent CABG without mechanical assistance, had a cardiac arrest within 24 hours of CABG, prior organ transplantation, or chronic dialysis were excluded. Propensity score analysis matched patients with Impella recovery (n = 19) and IABP recovery CABG (n = 19), and Kaplan-Meier analysis compared two-year survival between these groups. Patients who received Impella recovery CABG had significantly greater two-year survival at 100% compared to the IABP group at 60.5% (95% CI 39.9-91.7%) (log-rank p = 0.01). Impella recovery was associated with greater aortic cross clamp (p = 0.02) and cardiopulmonary bypass (p < 0.001) times and longer ICU stays (p = 0.008). There were no significant differences in major postoperative complications, including re-exploration for bleeding, stroke, and renal failure. Our exploratory study found that Impella recovery CABG was associated with decreased mortality compared to IABP recovery among patients with reduced LVEF. Larger cohorts with longer follow-up are necessary to assess whether this advanced mechanical support method confers a meaningful survival benefit in this high-risk patient population.

Indexed as

Coronary Artery BypassHeart-Assist DevicesVentricular Dysfunction, LeftAgedFemaleHumansIntra-Aortic Balloon PumpingMaleMiddle AgedPropensity ScoreRetrospective StudiesStroke VolumeTreatment OutcomeCABGCoronary artery bypass graftHeart failureImpella 5.5

Identifiers

PMID42365182

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.