ArticleJournal of artificial organs : the official journal of the Japanese Society for Artificial Organs2026
A potential survival benefit in coronary artery bypass grafting with micro-axial temporary pump recovery in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction.
Article in Journal of artificial organs : the official journal of the Japanese Society for Artificial Organs, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with temporary micro-axial ventricular assist device (Impella, Johnson and Johnson, Danvers, MA, USA) for peri-operative recovery has been utilized among patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). We hypothesized that Impella recovery CABG would be associated with increased two-year survival, compared to traditional intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) recovery CABG. 151 patients with low LVEF (≤ 25%) underwent on-pump CABG at our hospital system between July 2017 and March 2025. Patients who underwent CABG without mechanical assistance, had a cardiac arrest within 24 hours of CABG, prior organ transplantation, or chronic dialysis were excluded. Propensity score analysis matched patients with Impella recovery (n = 19) and IABP recovery CABG (n = 19), and Kaplan-Meier analysis compared two-year survival between these groups. Patients who received Impella recovery CABG had significantly greater two-year survival at 100% compared to the IABP group at 60.5% (95% CI 39.9-91.7%) (log-rank p = 0.01). Impella recovery was associated with greater aortic cross clamp (p = 0.02) and cardiopulmonary bypass (p < 0.001) times and longer ICU stays (p = 0.008). There were no significant differences in major postoperative complications, including re-exploration for bleeding, stroke, and renal failure. Our exploratory study found that Impella recovery CABG was associated with decreased mortality compared to IABP recovery among patients with reduced LVEF. Larger cohorts with longer follow-up are necessary to assess whether this advanced mechanical support method confers a meaningful survival benefit in this high-risk patient population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42365182What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.