ArticleBMC medical education2026
Association between sources of nutrition information and self-perceived nutrition competence of healthcare professionals: a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHealthcare professionals other than dietitians are widely perceived as credible sources of nutrition information by patients, despite many of these professionals having received limited nutrition training. Little is known about where healthcare professionals obtain nutrition information and how reliance on various sources of nutrition information relates to their self-perceived nutrition competence. This study aimed to investigate the association between the frequency of accessing nutrition information from evidence-based and non-evidence-based sources and healthcare professionals' self-perceived nutrition competence.
methodsA cross-sectional online survey was conducted using a questionnaire adapted from the NUTrition COMPetence (NUTCOMP) tool. Independent variables included self-reported frequencies of accessing various nutrition information sources in the preceding 30 days, measured by Likert-scale questions. The primary outcome was self-perceived nutrition competence assessed by NUTCOMP scores. A robust linear regression model was created to evaluate associations between NUTCOMP scores and frequencies of accessing different nutrition information sources, adjusting for age, sex, profession, education level, workplace, and previous nutrition education. The statistical significance level was set at 0.05.
resultsA total of 450 healthcare professionals working in healthcare facilities across China were enrolled, including 302 (67.11%) nurses and 124 (27.56%) doctors. The median NUTCOMP score was 120 (interquartile range 102-141). The most popular information sources were colleagues (n = 293), social media (n = 222), and professional websites (n = 121). More frequent access to nutrition information from colleagues (β = 3.75, p < 0.001), friends or family members (β = 2.71, p = 0.02), and academic webinars or continuing education (β = 3.92, p = 0.002) were significantly associated with higher NUTCOMP scores.
conclusionsHealthcare professionals in China frequently accessed nutrition information from both evidence-based and non-evidence-based sources. Frequencies of accessing nutrition information from colleagues, friends or family members, and academic webinars or continuing education were positively associated with self-perceived nutrition competence. The association observed with non-evidence-based sources highlights the need to better understand how information-seeking behaviors influence professional confidence and clinical practice. Future research is needed to develop strategies to strengthen evidence-based nutrition information sharing that may enhance nutrition competence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.