Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42366006›Full record

ReviewBMJ open2026

Clinical checklists of multicomponent non-pharmacological interventions for delirium management in adult patients in non-ICU inpatient healthcare settings: a rapid review.

Shirley H Bush, Monisha Kabir, Véronique French Merkley, Lindsey Sikora, Meera Agar, Annmarie Hosie, Imogen Featherstone, Sarina Isenberg, Peter Lawlor

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Shirley H BushDepartment of Medicine, Division of Palliative Care, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada sbush@uottawa.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8907-1283
Monisha KabirBruyère Health Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4456-7661
Véronique French MerkleyBruyère Health Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3382-3447
Lindsey SikoraHealth Sciences Library, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9715-8634
Meera AgarIMPACCT, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Annmarie HosieIMPACCT, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Imogen FeatherstoneDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.
Sarina IsenbergDepartment of Medicine, Division of Palliative Care, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Peter LawlorDepartment of Medicine, Division of Palliative Care, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7319-1395

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo identify clinical checklists of multicomponent non-pharmacological interventions for the prevention and treatment of delirium used in non-intensive care unit inpatient healthcare settings, their content and reported implementation.

designRapid review. DATA SOURCES: Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched from 1 January 1999 to 31 March 2022 and updated on 16 January 2025. A comprehensive grey literature search, including websites of guideline development groups and international delirium organisations, was conducted on 26 and 27 February 2024. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: We included records reporting the use of a 'clinical checklist' used by the healthcare team, family carers or adult patient (≥18 years) to prompt and document multicomponent non-pharmacological interventions for the prevention or treatment of delirium. Publication language was restricted to English and French. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Using rapid review methodology, two independent reviewers screened the included records. A single reviewer undertook the data extraction, with a third independent reviewer verifying the data extraction for completeness. All included studies were assessed using the JBI critical appraisal tools according to the study design. A narrative synthesis was used to summarise the findings.

resultsFrom the database searches, 4796 records were identified. After the removal of duplicates, 3513 records underwent title and abstract screening, with 344 records undergoing full-text screening. A final 32 records were included. From the grey literature search, 6593 records were reviewed for relevance, from which 62 records were included in full-text screening. No grey literature records were of high enough quality to be included. All studies were published in English, with most studies conducted in the USA, n=12/32 (37.5%). The 32 studies were quasi-experimental (n=18), randomised controlled trials (n=8), qualitative (n=4), expert opinion (n=1) and policy/consensus guidelines (n=1). Clinical checklists included structured protocols, algorithms and order sets, which were paper-based or part of electronic delirium order sets. People with dementia participated as key stakeholders for a guidance document during the COVID-19 pandemic, but the target population was not included in the development phase of other checklists. Target users of clinical checklists were usually healthcare staff and trained volunteers and rarely family carers and study intervention nurses. Four of the 32 studies included all 10 National Institute for Health and Care Excellence clinical factors/preventive strategies for non-pharmacological interventions. For the remaining 28 studies, missing domains varied and included: therapeutic/cognitive activity, hydration, nutrition, constipation, urinary catheterisation, hypoxia, infection, pain and medication review. Only two studies involved family carers as active partners in patient care. Reported formal economic analysis was limited.

conclusionsCodesign of future clinical checklists should involve patients and family carers. Further research is needed on the feasibility of using clinical checklists by all members of the interprofessional team and family carers, the factors needed to ensure high levels of adherence and sustainability of multicomponent non-pharmacological interventions for delirium management, in addition to economic evaluations. PROSPERO REGISTRATION: CRD42022342328.

Indexed as

ChecklistDeliriumAdultHumansInpatientschecklistDeliriumelectronic health recordsfamily caregiverinpatientsnon-pharmacological interventionspreventiontreatment

Identifiers

PMID42366006
PMCPMC13311756

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.