ArticleEJNMMI physics2026
Impact of reduced
Article in EJNMMI physics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
background¹⁸F-MK6240 tau positron emission tomography (PET) is critical in Alzheimer's disease diagnosis and therapeutic monitoring. However, the standard 20-minute static acquisition poses challenges for cognitively impaired patients with limited tolerance for prolonged scans. This study evaluates the feasibility of reducing scan time while maintaining diagnostic accuracy through image quality and quantitative comparisons.
methods69 memory clinic patients (27 males and 42 females) who underwent
resultsAmong the 69 patients, 50 were classified as tau-positive and 19 as tau-negative. Diagnostic efficacy remained consistent across acquisition times compared to the 20-minute reference. The slight reduction in image quality for the 5-minute images relative to the other groups, but none of the images across any of the four durations were rated as poor (score < 3). For 16 predefined regions used for visual assessment of regional tau involvement, both readers showed near-perfect agreement in scoring the extent of involvement (0%, 1-25%, 26-75%, or > 75%) across the four scan durations, as evidenced by Kendall's W coefficients ranging from 0.984 to 1.000 (all p < 0.001). Negative scans showed lower SUVr spread over Braak stages of four different time duration. Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated high agreement in Braak-stage SUVr values between the 20-minute images and the shortened acquisitions with mean differences close to zero across all comparisons.
conclusionShortening ¹⁸F-MK6240 PET acquisition to 5 min on a modern high-sensitivity PET/MR system results in a small, clinically acceptable decline in image quality. It does not compromise the reliability of visual reads or the stability of semi-quantitative measures compared to the standard 20-minute scan. These findings support the feasibility of 5-minute protocols, which offer practical benefits like reduced motion artifacts and improved patient throughput, as an operationally efficient alternative in clinical tau imaging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.