Evidence mapPaperPMID 42366266Full record

ReviewFunctional & integrative genomics2026

Integrating artificial intelligence and multi-omics data for precision oncology in endometrial cancer: a narrative review.

Oishee Mondal, Masuma Khatun, Ankita Lawarde, Sajitha Lulu S, Vino Sundararajan, Andres Salumets, Vijayachitra Modhukur

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Functional & integrative genomics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Oishee Mondal *Integrative Multiomics Lab, School of Bio Sciences and Technology, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, 632014, Tamil Nadu, India.
Masuma Khatun *Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Haartmaninkatu 8, Helsinki, 00290, Finland.
Ankita LawardeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Tartu, L. Puusepa 8, Tartu, 50406, Estonia.
Sajitha Lulu SIntegrative Multiomics Lab, School of Bio Sciences and Technology, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, 632014, Tamil Nadu, India.
Vino SundararajanIntegrative Multiomics Lab, School of Bio Sciences and Technology, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, 632014, Tamil Nadu, India.
Andres SalumetsDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Tartu, L. Puusepa 8, Tartu, 50406, Estonia. andres.salumets@ki.se.
Vijayachitra ModhukurDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Tartu, L. Puusepa 8, Tartu, 50406, Estonia. modhukur@ut.ee.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7123-9903

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endometrial cancer (EC) is the most common gynaecological malignancy worldwide, yet the prognosis for advanced and recurrent disease remains poor, highlighting the need for improved diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic decision-making frameworks. Conventional approaches, including histopathology, imaging, and single-layer molecular profiling, provide essential clinical information but may not fully capture EC's biological heterogeneity, especially within clinically challenging No Specific Molecular Profile (NSMP) and mismatch repair-deficient (MMRd) subgroups. Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) provide powerful approaches to analyse complex, high-dimensional datasets generated by multi-omics profiling, histopathology, imaging, and clinical records.In this review, we synthesize the latest evidence on AI-driven multi-omics research in EC, encompassing genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics, epigenomics, single-cell profiling, and spatial transcriptomics. Unlike other reviews that focus solely on AI, omics, or imaging, we integrate molecular, imaging, histopathological, and computational perspectives to underscore their collective impact on precision oncology in EC. We subsequently explore applications in molecular subtyping, predicting survival and recurrence, modelling treatment responses, discovering immunotherapy biomarkers, and identifying drug targets. Public resources such as The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), Clinical Proteomic Tumour Analysis Consortium (CPTAC), Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO), cBioPortal, Human Protein Atlas, GTEx, and UCSC Xena have enabled large-scale reproducible analyses. However, challenges such as cohort heterogeneity, batch effects, ethnic underrepresentation, missing annotations, and the need for external validation remain significant hurdles.We then discuss the progression from conventional ML methods to deep learning architectures, including convolutional neural networks, transformers, graph neural networks, and multimodal fusion models applied to histopathological, radiological, and multi-omics data. Landmark models such as EndoNet, EndoRisk, and HECTOR illustrate the potential of AI-enabled approaches to support EC grading, molecular inference, lymph node metastasis prediction, and recurrence-risk stratification. Finally, we examine key translational barriers, including class imbalance, interpretability, data harmonization, regulatory requirements, and the implementation gap between high-performing retrospective models and routine clinical deployment. Ultimately, this review underscores how bridging these multi-modal computational approaches paves the way for precision oncology in EC.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceEndometrial NeoplasmsPrecision MedicineFemaleGenomicsHumansMachine LearningMultiomicsProteomicsArtificial intelligenceBiomarker discoveryDeep learningEndometrial cancerMulti-omicsPrecision oncologySpatial transcriptomics

Identifiers

PMID42366266
PMCPMC13310831

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.