ArticleGenetics, selection, evolution : GSE2026
Genomic partitioning and functional dissection of inbreeding depression for stature in Brown Swiss cattle.
Article in Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Across-breed analyses of genome-wide association studies for stature and mammary gland morphology in cattle reveal pleiotropic effects of the Friesian POLLED haplotype.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSmall effective population size and the disproportionately large use of few genetically superior bulls in artificial insemination lead to extensive runs of homozygosity and an increased risk of homozygosity for deleterious alleles in domestic cattle, which may cause inbreeding depression. The adverse effects of inbreeding on phenotypic performance are well established, but the genetic variants contributing to inbreeding depression remain largely unknown. This study aimed to analyse the impacts of inbreeding on stature (measured as height at the sacral bone) in a cohort of 15,306 Brown Swiss (BS) cows that have imputed genotypes at 20 million sequence variants and stature measurements as height at the sacral bone.
resultsThe average genomic inbreeding coefficient of the 15,306 BS cows estimated from runs of homozygosity (ROH) was 0.369 (± 0.022). We found a loss in stature, with height at the sacral bone decreasing by 0.076 cm per 1% increase in inbreeding (p = 1.94e-09). Contributions to inbreeding depression were significant for long (> 2 Mb), medium (> 0.1-≤ 2 Mb), and short (≥ 50 kb-≤ 0.1 Mb) ROH (p = 1.29e-12, p = 3.20e-04 and p = 1.77e-06, respectively), suggesting that both ancient and recent inbreeding have negative effects on stature. Non-additive association testing identified a novel recessive quantitative trait locus (QTL) for stature on chromosome 25, with the most significantly associated SNP (p = 2.35e-21) residing at 14,535,327 bp. Cows homozygous for the alternate allele of the top-associated SNP were 2 cm shorter than heterozygous and reference allele homozygotes. Fine mapping of the QTL identified a splice donor variant (rs447836030 at 25:14,515,474) of the gene ABCC6 encoding ATP-binding cassette subfamily C member 6 which causes exon skipping as both a positional and functional candidate causal variant.
conclusionsOur study reveals evidence for inbreeding depression on stature in a large cohort of BS cattle. We also uncover a recessive QTL that decreases stature through non-additive association testing. This QTL harbors a high-impact variant affecting a splice donor site of ABCC6 which leads to exon skipping, thereby possibly contributing to inbreeding depression. Accumulating non-lethal deleterious alleles in ROH may reduce the overall fitness of the BS cattle population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.