Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42366437›Full record

ArticleSheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi2026

[A two-stage model for predicting postoperative pulmonary infection in esophageal cancer patients].

Yu Wang, Lixia Yin, Bo Yao, Jiang Wu, Jiangbo Pu

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yu WangInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Tianjin 300192, P. R. China.
Lixia YinDepartment of Hospital Infection Management, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, P. R. China.
Bo YaoInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Tianjin 300192, P. R. China.
Jiang WuDeep Underground Space Medical Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, P. R. China.
Jiangbo PuInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Tianjin 300192, P. R. China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Postoperative pulmonary infection (PPI) after esophageal cancer surgery occurs frequently and severely impairs patients' prognosis. Most existing prediction models cannot realize staged classification of risk factors, which limits targeted risk identification and intervention. Based on machine learning algorithms, this study integrates preoperative baseline characteristics and perioperative indicators to construct a preoperative-perioperative two-stage risk prediction model for postoperative pulmonary infection. Clinical data of 2 200 patients undergoing esophageal cancer surgery admitted to the Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences between October 2022 and August 2024 were retrospectively enrolled. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator was combined with multivariate logistic regression to screen independent predictive variables for the two stages, and five machine learning models were established accordingly. Six independent predictive variables were identified. The preoperative predictors included gender, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification, and colonization of multidrug-resistant bacteria. All models yielded area under the curve values ranging from 0.71 to 0.72 with a specificity higher than 98%, which can be used for preoperative risk stratification of high-risk individuals. On the basis of preoperative variables, the perioperative stage additionally incorporated operation duration, postoperative intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and peak C-reactive protein level within 0-3 days after surgery, leading to a remarkable improvement in predictive performance with all area under the curve values greater than 0.82. The gradient boosting machine (GBM) model achieved a favorable balance between a sensitivity of 69.07% and a specificity of 82.59%, providing support for risk stratification and clinical management decision-making. Further multicenter studies are required to validate the generalization ability of the model.

Indexed as

Esophageal NeoplasmsPostoperative ComplicationsFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMachine LearningMaleMiddle AgedPrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning ModelsPrognosisRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsEsophageal cancerMachine learningPostoperative pulmonary infectionRisk prediction

Identifiers

PMID42366437
PMCPMC13311042

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.