ArticleNursing in critical care2026
'Should We Start CPR?': How Iranian Nurses Make Resuscitation Decisions in Intensive Care Units?
Article in Nursing in critical care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundInitiation of resuscitation (IOR) in intensive care units (ICUs) is a high stakes and ethically complex decision, in which nurses are often the first professionals to recognise cardiac arrest and act. Although resuscitation guidelines provide standardised algorithms, nurses' real-world IOR decisions are shaped by intertwined clinical, ethical, organisational and sociocultural factors.
aimThis study aimed to explore and explain the IOR decision-making process among Iranian ICU nurses. STUDY
designThis qualitative study used Strauss and Corbin's grounded theory methodology. Fourteen participants, including ICU nurses, nurse managers and physicians, were recruited through purposive and theoretical sampling from university hospitals in Iran. Data were generated through 16 in-depth semi-structured interviews and field notes. Analysis followed constant comparative methods with iterative open, axial and selective coding supported by memo writing. Methodological rigour was ensured through adherence to Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) guidelines and Lincoln and Guba's criteria for trustworthiness.
findingsNurses' main concern was living in a 'limbo between duty and outcome', reflecting tension between legal-professional mandates for IOR and realistic expectations regarding prognosis and post-resuscitation quality of life. The core category, patient-centred self-protection, explained how nurses balanced ethical intent, anticipated patient benefit and self-preservation within contexts characterised by legal ambiguity, cultural-religious values, hierarchical dynamics and structural constraints. Three interrelated strategies-rule-driven, ethics-driven and defensive-led to consequences ranging from moral distress and disengagement to professional moral-existential fulfilment.
conclusionsIOR decision-making in ICUs is dynamic, context-dependent and morally complex, requiring nurses to continuously negotiate competing expectations under uncertainty. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Context-sensitive CPR guidelines, legal clarity, ethical support, effective leadership and simulation-based education may strengthen nurses' moral agency, reduce defensive practice and promote humane, patient-centred resuscitation in critical care settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.