Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42367194›Full record

ArticleISME communications2026

Antibiotic course frequency and recovery strategies alter gut microbial composition and metabolism.

Kaoutar Abaakil, Zhigang Liu, Mu Wang, Elina Kuznecova, Ming S C Sung, Julian R Marchesi, Michaela A Mausz, Jia V Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ISME communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kaoutar AbaakilDivision of Digestive Diseases, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London W12 0NN, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-9614-0599
Zhigang LiuDivision of Digestive Diseases, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London W12 0NN, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1363-6708
Mu WangDivision of Digestive Diseases, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London W12 0NN, United Kingdom.
Elina KuznecovaDivision of Digestive Diseases, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London W12 0NN, United Kingdom.
Ming S C SungDivision of Digestive Diseases, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London W12 0NN, United Kingdom.
Julian R MarchesiDivision of Digestive Diseases, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London W12 0NN, United Kingdom.
Michaela A MauszSchool of Life Sciences, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, United Kingdom.
Jia V LiDivision of Digestive Diseases, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London W12 0NN, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5763-6670

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antibiotics profoundly alter the gut microbiome, but how exposure frequencies shape microbial recovery remains unclear. The effectiveness of post-antibiotic interventions, e.g. probiotics or autologous fecal microbiota transplantation, (aFMT) requires further exploration. This study investigated how antibiotic course timing and recovery strategies influence gut microbiome and metabolism in male Wistar rats. A single oral dose of vancomycin-ciprofloxacin (VC) caused rapid urinary and fecal metabolic shifts within 8-12 h and reduced bacterial α-diversity in cecal and colonic contents. When three VC courses were administered at regular (every 3 weeks; VCr) or irregular (1-3 weeks; VCi) intervals, VCr showed greater suppression of fecal α-diversity and stronger disruption of amino acid and host-microbial co-metabolism than VCi. Over the 3-week recovery period, VCr exhibited slower fecal α-diversity restoration; at week 3, β-diversity remained significantly different between groups, and cecal butyrate levels were persistently reduced in VCr. Both groups showed elevated levels of 5-aminovalerate in feces and colon compared with controls, whereas only VCi showed reductions in jejunal and ileal amino acids. Probiotics or aFMT had limited influence on small intestinal alterations, though aFMT accelerated fecal α-diversity recovery, and both interventions promoted partial normalization of fecal amino acids and 5-aminovalerate, without achieving complete restoration. Overall, shorter antibiotic intervals exerted stronger effects on the small intestinal luminal chemical environment, whereas longer intervals led to greater suppression of colonic and fecal microbial metabolism. Probiotics and aFMT supported selective metabolic recovery without fully reversing antibiotics-induced disturbances, highlighting the need for more targeted restoration strategies across gastrointestinal regions.

Indexed as

16S rRNA gene sequencing1H Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) spectroscopyantibioticshost-microbial interactionmetabolic profilingmetabolomicssmall intestine

Identifiers

PMID42367194
PMCPMC13310174

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.