ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2026
Qualitative analysis of pharmacogenetic applications in pediatric clinical trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Pharmacogenetics (PGx) may support more individualized pediatric therapy by accounting for genetic variability in drug response, toxicity, and dose requirements. However, the extent and manner in which pharmacogenetic and biomarker-related components are incorporated into pediatric clinical trials remain incompletely characterized. Objectives: To qualitatively examine how pharmacogenetic and biomarker-related components are represented and operationalized in pediatric clinical trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, with emphasis on disease distribution, apparent roles within trial design, and the primary and secondary outcome domains reported in these studies. Methods: A registry-based qualitative analysis was conducted using ClinicalTrials.gov. Interventional Phase II to IV trials enrolling participants younger than 18 years of age were screened from database inception through July 2025 using pharmacogenetic-related search terms. Eligible studies included pediatric trials incorporating pharmacogenetic or pharmacogenomic components relevant to drug response, efficacy, toxicity, pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics, dose optimization, or treatment selection. Included trials were classified by primary clinical disease category, apparent level of pharmacogenetic integration, and primary and secondary outcome domains. Results: A total of 198 pediatric trials met the inclusion criteria. Infectious diseases and oncology were the most frequently represented primary clinical disease categories, each accounting for 37 (18.7%) of included trials, followed by psychiatry and respiratory diseases at 20 (10.1%) each. Exploratory or observational incorporation of pharmacogenetic or biomarker-related information was the most common pattern, accounting for 121 (61.1%) of trials, whereas guided intervention and decision-informing use accounted for 39 (19.7%) and 25 (12.6%), respectively. At the primary outcome level, clinical efficacy was the dominant domain, accounting for 82 (41.4%) of trials, followed by biomarkers/molecular outcomes at 48 (24.2%). Among secondary outcomes coded as inclusive occurrences, biomarkers/molecular outcomes were the leading category at 116 (27.0%), followed by clinical efficacy at 103 (24.0%). Conclusion: Pediatric pharmacogenetic trials appear to be advancing but remain largely positioned at an intermediate translational stage. Pharmacogenetic and biomarker-related components were more often exploratory than treatment-guiding, highlighting the need for clearer registry reporting and more explicit trial designs that distinguish exploratory, decision-informing, and clinically actionable PGx roles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.