ReviewCureus2026
How NeuroArts Aid in the Well-Being of People: A Scoping Review.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
NeuroArts is an emerging interdisciplinary field examining how creative and aesthetic experiences influence neural, physiological, and behavioral processes related to health and well-being. This study aimed to map and synthesize existing evidence on arts-based interventions and their impact on well-being across healthy and clinical populations. A scoping review was conducted from May to November 2025 in accordance with PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Studies published between January 2000 and November 2025 involving arts-based interventions in healthy or clinical populations were included. Literature searches were performed using PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, and HERDIN databases. Titles, abstracts, and full texts were screened independently according to predefined eligibility criteria, and relevant study characteristics and outcomes were extracted. Included studies were categorized based on the World Health Organization classifications of art forms. A total of 9,614 records were identified, with 67 studies meeting the inclusion criteria. Arts-based interventions - including music, dance, visual arts, literature, and cultural engagement - were associated with improvements in psychological well-being, cognitive function, and quality of life across populations. NeuroArts provides a useful framework for understanding how arts-based practices contribute to health and well-being in both clinical and community contexts. Findings support the integration of arts-based interventions into therapeutic and health-promoting settings, with implications for clinical practice, policy, and future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.