Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42367680›Full record

Trial reportFrontiers in rehabilitation sciences2026

Safety and feasibility of paired vagus nerve stimulation with rehabilitation for improving upper extremity function in people with cervical spinal cord injury: a pilot randomized controlled trial.

Radha Korupolu, Nuray Yozbatiran, Alyssa Miller, Meredith Shields, Nitin Tandon

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05601661 (Safety and Feasibility of Paired Vagus Nerve Stimulation With Rehabilitation for Improving Upper Extremity Function in People With Cervical Spinal Cord Injury), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05601661 nacompletednot on this map

Safety and Feasibility of Paired Vagus Nerve Stimulation With Rehabilitation for Improving Upper Extremity Function in People With Cervical Spinal Cord Injury: A Pilot Randomized Control Trial.

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe University of Texas Health Science Center, HoustonRan2023 to 2025Enrolled6ConditionsCervical Spinal Cord InjuryArmsActive VNS, Sham VNS, Arm rehabilitation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Radha KorupoluDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, United States.
Nuray YozbatiranDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, United States.
Alyssa MillerDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, United States.
Meredith ShieldsTIRR Memorial Hermann Hospital, Houston, TX, United States.
Nitin TandonVivian L. Smith Department of Neurosurgery, McGovern Medical School, UTHealth Houston, Houston, TX, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Recovery of upper extremity function remains a major unmet need for individuals with chronic cervical spinal cord injury (SCI). Pairing vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) with task-specific rehabilitation has been shown to enhance neuroplasticity and motor recovery in stroke, but evidence in SCI is limited. Objective: To evaluate the safety and feasibility of pairing VNS with upper extremity rehabilitation in individuals with chronic cervical SCI, and to explore preliminary effects on upper extremity function. Methods: This single-site, triple-blind, randomized, sham-controlled pilot trial enrolled adults with chronic traumatic incomplete cervical SCI. All participants underwent implantation of a VNS device and were randomized 1:1 to receive active VNS paired with rehabilitation or sham VNS paired with rehabilitation. Participants completed 18 in-clinic rehabilitation sessions over 6-8 weeks, followed by a 90-day home-based exercise program. Primary outcomes were safety and feasibility; exploratory outcomes included standardized upper extremity motor measures and patient-reported experiences. The randomized design was intended to assess feasibility of trial procedures rather than estimate treatment effects. Results: Six participants were implanted and completed study procedures through 90-day follow-up. No serious adverse events, unanticipated adverse device effects, or unresolved surgery-related complications were observed. In-clinic therapy adherence was high, supporting the feasibility of the intervention. At the immediate post-intervention, all participants receiving active VNS demonstrated mild-to-moderate improvements in upper extremity motor function, whereas no improvements were observed in the sham group. At 90 days, two active VNS participants sustained these gains. Participants receiving active VNS reported subjective improvements in coordination, movement quality, and daily task performance. Conclusion: This pilot randomized trial demonstrates that pairing invasive VNS with upper extremity rehabilitation in individuals with chronic cervical spinal cord injury is safe, feasible, and well-tolerated. While clinical improvements were exploratory, positive participant-reported experiences and observed patterns of improvement support further investigation in larger trials designed to rigorously assess efficacy, durability, and optimal dosing parameters. Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT05601661.

Indexed as

neuromodulationneurorehabilitationspinal cord injuryupper extremity functionvagus nerve stimulation

Identifiers

PMID42367680
PMCPMC13294046

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.