Trial reportFrontiers in rehabilitation sciences2026
Safety and feasibility of paired vagus nerve stimulation with rehabilitation for improving upper extremity function in people with cervical spinal cord injury: a pilot randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05601661 (Safety and Feasibility of Paired Vagus Nerve Stimulation With Rehabilitation for Improving Upper Extremity Function in People With Cervical Spinal Cord Injury), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Safety and Feasibility of Paired Vagus Nerve Stimulation With Rehabilitation for Improving Upper Extremity Function in People With Cervical Spinal Cord Injury: A Pilot Randomized Control Trial.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Recovery of upper extremity function remains a major unmet need for individuals with chronic cervical spinal cord injury (SCI). Pairing vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) with task-specific rehabilitation has been shown to enhance neuroplasticity and motor recovery in stroke, but evidence in SCI is limited. Objective: To evaluate the safety and feasibility of pairing VNS with upper extremity rehabilitation in individuals with chronic cervical SCI, and to explore preliminary effects on upper extremity function. Methods: This single-site, triple-blind, randomized, sham-controlled pilot trial enrolled adults with chronic traumatic incomplete cervical SCI. All participants underwent implantation of a VNS device and were randomized 1:1 to receive active VNS paired with rehabilitation or sham VNS paired with rehabilitation. Participants completed 18 in-clinic rehabilitation sessions over 6-8 weeks, followed by a 90-day home-based exercise program. Primary outcomes were safety and feasibility; exploratory outcomes included standardized upper extremity motor measures and patient-reported experiences. The randomized design was intended to assess feasibility of trial procedures rather than estimate treatment effects. Results: Six participants were implanted and completed study procedures through 90-day follow-up. No serious adverse events, unanticipated adverse device effects, or unresolved surgery-related complications were observed. In-clinic therapy adherence was high, supporting the feasibility of the intervention. At the immediate post-intervention, all participants receiving active VNS demonstrated mild-to-moderate improvements in upper extremity motor function, whereas no improvements were observed in the sham group. At 90 days, two active VNS participants sustained these gains. Participants receiving active VNS reported subjective improvements in coordination, movement quality, and daily task performance. Conclusion: This pilot randomized trial demonstrates that pairing invasive VNS with upper extremity rehabilitation in individuals with chronic cervical spinal cord injury is safe, feasible, and well-tolerated. While clinical improvements were exploratory, positive participant-reported experiences and observed patterns of improvement support further investigation in larger trials designed to rigorously assess efficacy, durability, and optimal dosing parameters. Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT05601661.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.