ReviewFrontiers in immunology2026
Immune signaling as a determinant of cellular identity and tissue function.
Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Immunology has traditionally interpreted tissue pathology through models centered on immune-mediated cytotoxicity. In this prevailing model, functional decline is considered a downstream consequence of cell death and irreversible loss of cellular mass. Increasing evidence across metabolically active tissues challenges this paradigm by demonstrating that immune-derived signals exert potent regulatory effects on cellular identity that are independent of overt cytotoxicity. Cytokines, interferons, and inflammatory mediators directly engage transcriptional, epigenetic, and stress-response networks that sustain differentiated states. This engagement leads to suppression of lineage-defining gene programs, destabilization of identity-enforcing regulatory circuits, and sustained impairment of specialized function while cellular viability is preserved. In this Perspective, we propose a conceptual reframing in which immune systems are considered continuous regulators of cellular identity stability rather than solely as determinants of cell survival. The process becomes stabilized through epigenetic remodeling and generates persistent dysfunctional states that may be variably reversible depending on the duration and intensity of immune exposure. The proposed framework distinguishes immune-induced plasticity from epigenetically fixed identity failure. By repositioning immune instruction of cellular identity as one of the central mechanisms of disease pathogenesis, this framework opens new conceptual avenues. It further emphasizes therapeutic strategies focused on restoring tissue function through the reestablishment of differentiated states.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.