ArticleFrontiers in immunology2026
Unraveling immune-inflammation-aging network interactions: an interpretable machine learning model predicts the risk of postherpetic neuralgia.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) is the most common and intractable complication of herpes zoster (HZ). Early and accurate identification of patients at high risk for PHN is crucial for effective interventions. This study aimed to establish a high-performance and interpretable machine learning prediction model. Methods: This was a single-center retrospective cohort study that ultimately included 480 patients hospitalized with a diagnosis of HZ at the First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University (January to December 2024). Patients were divided into PHN and non-PHN groups. Multidimensional predictors were collected through the electronic medical record system. Integrated feature screening was performed using the Boruta algorithm, random forest, and LASSO regression. Six machine learning models (including XGBoost) were trained and compared using nested cross-validation, and the optimal model was interpreted via the SHAP framework. Results: The incidence of PHN was 23.3%. Eight key predictors were identified: age, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), absolute lymphocyte count (ALC), serum albumin (ALB), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), absolute eosinophil count (AEC), serum calcium (Ca) and neutrophil-to-platelet ratio (NPR). Among the six models, XGBoost demonstrated optimal performance with an AUC of 0.919 (95% CI: 0.910-0.927) in nested cross-validation. It also showed a sensitivity of 0.836 and a specificity of 0.831. SHAP analysis suggested relatively linear effects for age, ALB, ALC and AEC, whereas NLR, PLR and Ca exhibited more complex, potentially nonlinear associations with PHN risk. Interaction analysis further indicated extensive synergistic effects among these factors, collectively providing a preliminary outline of a potential risk network grounded in "aging," centered on "immune-inflammation," and modulated by nutritional status. An online calculator based on this model has been deployed. Conclusions: This study developed and internally validated a high-performance, interpretable PHN risk prediction model. Its interpretable output suggests that the occurrence of PHN may be associated with an imbalance in the immune-inflammation-aging network, generating new hypotheses for its pathogenesis. The accompanying online tool offers research-grade decision support for individualized clinical risk management, pending external validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.