Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42367822›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in immunology2026

Steroid pulse therapy for acute T-cell-mediated rejection after kidney transplantation: mechanisms, evidence, and unresolved questions.

Sami Siam, Göran Ramin Boeckel, Chalid Hasan, Hermann Pavenstädt, Klemens Budde, Stefan Reuter

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sami SiamDepartment of Medicine D, Transplant Nephrology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
Göran Ramin BoeckelDepartment of Medicine D, Transplant Nephrology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
Chalid HasanDepartment of Medicine D, Transplant Nephrology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
Hermann PavenstädtDepartment of Medicine D, Transplant Nephrology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
Klemens BuddeDepartment of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Stefan ReuterDepartment of Medicine D, Transplant Nephrology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intravenous methylprednisolone (MP) pulse therapy remains the standard first-line treatment for acute T-cell-mediated rejection following kidney transplantation. However, the dose and duration of this therapy were established empirically more than three decades ago rather than by contemporary rigorous dose-finding trials. The most common treatment regimens consist of 250-500 mg MP daily for three to five days, but substantial between-center variability persists. This narrative review explores the historical development of steroid pulse dosing, the available comparative clinical data, and the biological rationale underlying current practice. The commonly used dose range of 250-500 mg daily for three to five days rests largely on historical convention rather than on contemporary dose-finding evidence. A series of small prospective and randomized studies failed to demonstrate superior efficacy of more intensive regimens when compared with doses broadly resembling current practice. Mechanistically, glucocorticoids act through genomic and rapid non-genomic pathways, supporting a hypothesis-generating dose-window concept rather than a simple linear dose-response model. Contemporary data further indicate that clinical response does not reliably predict histologic resolution and that MP pulse rejection treatment carries significant toxicity. Overall, steroid pulse therapy remains biologically plausible and clinically entrenched; however, the optimal dose and duration have yet to be established under current tacrolimus- and mycophenolate-based immunosuppression. More precise response monitoring will also be required to develop more effective and less toxic treatment regimens.

Indexed as

GlucocorticoidsGraft RejectionImmunosuppressive AgentsKidney TransplantationMethylprednisoloneT-LymphocytesAnimalsHumansPulse Therapy, DrugTreatment OutcomeGlucocorticoidsImmunosuppressive AgentsMethylprednisoloneacute rejectionglucocorticoidsimmunometabolismkidney transplantationmethylprednisolonenon-genomic mechanismspulse therapyT-cell-mediated rejection

Identifiers

PMID42367822
PMCPMC13303207

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.