ReviewFrontiers in immunology2026
Steroid pulse therapy for acute T-cell-mediated rejection after kidney transplantation: mechanisms, evidence, and unresolved questions.
Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intravenous methylprednisolone (MP) pulse therapy remains the standard first-line treatment for acute T-cell-mediated rejection following kidney transplantation. However, the dose and duration of this therapy were established empirically more than three decades ago rather than by contemporary rigorous dose-finding trials. The most common treatment regimens consist of 250-500 mg MP daily for three to five days, but substantial between-center variability persists. This narrative review explores the historical development of steroid pulse dosing, the available comparative clinical data, and the biological rationale underlying current practice. The commonly used dose range of 250-500 mg daily for three to five days rests largely on historical convention rather than on contemporary dose-finding evidence. A series of small prospective and randomized studies failed to demonstrate superior efficacy of more intensive regimens when compared with doses broadly resembling current practice. Mechanistically, glucocorticoids act through genomic and rapid non-genomic pathways, supporting a hypothesis-generating dose-window concept rather than a simple linear dose-response model. Contemporary data further indicate that clinical response does not reliably predict histologic resolution and that MP pulse rejection treatment carries significant toxicity. Overall, steroid pulse therapy remains biologically plausible and clinically entrenched; however, the optimal dose and duration have yet to be established under current tacrolimus- and mycophenolate-based immunosuppression. More precise response monitoring will also be required to develop more effective and less toxic treatment regimens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.