ReviewACS omega2026
From Chemistry to Clinic: Amorphous Solid-State Modification Strategies for Oral Azole Antifungals.
Review in ACS omega, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Azole antifungals remain central to the management of superficial and systemic mycoses, yet the growing global incidence, rising resistance, and persistent treatment failures highlight the need for improved oral formulations. Current azole products are predominantly capsules or liquid preparations that have well-documented limitations with patient adherence and bioavailability. Traditional formulation efforts have relied heavily on crystalline solid forms because of their predictable behavior and established manufacturing pathways. However, this long-standing preference has restricted exploitation of alternative solid-state strategies capable of meaningfully improving aqueous solubilitya key determinant of oral bioavailability. Advances in analytical technologies have broadened interest in amorphous and coamorphous systems, but issues such as instability, hygroscopicity, and unpredictable dissolution behavior continue to limit their reliability. This review explores the expanding field of supramolecular solid-state design for azoles, with a focus on noncrystalline forms, particularly eutectic mixtures, as an underutilized but highly promising formulation approach. Eutectic systems occupy a unique microcrystalline space between the high solubility amorphous forms and the stable crystalline solids, offering enhanced solubility without the need for polymeric stabilizers that often complicate amorphous formulations. Despite more than six decades of sporadic investigation, their pharmaceutical potential remains considerably underexplored, especially for BCS II compounds, such as azoles. By consolidating current knowledge on azole solid-state chemistry, highlighting the limitations of existing formulation strategies, and evaluating the emerging rationale for intentional eutectic design, this review positions eutectic mixtures as a viable and impactful pathway for developing next-generation azole formulations with improved oral bioavailability and therapeutic performance.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.