Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42368213›Full record

ArticleEuropean heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology2026

Optimizing revascularization in the high-risk heart: Impella™-facilitated percutaneous coronary intervention in multivessel coronary artery disease with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction and mitral regurgitation.

Cristina Aurigemma, Jerzy Sacha, Pia Lanmüller, Aleksandra Gąsecka, Luca Baldetti, Ee Ling Heng, Stanislaw Bartus, Nikos Werner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Cristina AurigemmaDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences, C.U.O.R.E. Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168 Roma, Italy.
Jerzy SachaDepartment of Cardiology, University Clinical Hospital in Opole, Al. Witosa 26, 45-401 Opole, Poland.
Pia LanmüllerDepartment of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany.
Aleksandra GąseckaDepartment of Cardiology Medical University of Warsaw, 1st Chair, Medical University of Warsaw, Banacha 1a, 02-097 Warsaw, Poland.
Luca BaldettiCardiac Intensive Care Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Via Olgettina, 60, 20132 Milano, Italy.
Ee Ling HengDepartment of Cardiology, Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals, Sydney Street, London SW3 6NP, UK.
Stanislaw Bartus2nd Department of Cardiology, Institute of Cardiology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Jakubowskiego 2, 30-688 Kraków, Poland.
Nikos WernerHeart Centre Trier, Hospital of the Brothers of Mercy, Nordallee 1, 54292 Trier, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is considered for patients at high risk for peri-operative mortality and complications during coronary artery bypass grafting, with further consideration of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) to prevent haemodynamic decompensation in patients with complex coronary artery disease and reduced ventricular function. However, current risk models do not account for crucial factors such as frailty or severity of valvular disease, potentially underestimating surgical risk. As such, the surgeon's clinical judgment may more accurately reflect a given patient's mortality risk. Here, we present a clinical scenario of a frail, inoperable 73-year-old male with mitral regurgitation and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction who underwent successful complex high-risk PCI supported by an Impella™ microaxial flow pump. A multidisciplinary approach was taken in determining the patient's anatomical and clinical risk profile, with consideration of both conventional risk scores as well as the patient's frailty. The multivessel procedure was carefully planned to minimize intra-procedural risk while achieving the most complete and durable revascularization possible. Planned early use of MCS played a central role in maintaining haemodynamic stability during the intervention. The patient recovered without vascular or device-related complications, and at 6 months, demonstrated improved left ventricular ejection fraction to 45%. This scenario highlights the feasibility and safety of this approach when performed in an experienced centre; however additional studies are needed to define optimal patient selection, procedural protocols, and follow-up pathways. Until then, meticulous multidisciplinary evaluation, tailored procedural planning, and rigorous post-procedural care remain the cornerstones of success.

Indexed as

FrailtyHigh-risk percutaneous coronary interventionMechanical circulatory supportMultidisciplinary procedural planning

Identifiers

PMID42368213
PMCPMC13294553

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.