Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42368225›Full record

ArticleNIHR open research2025

Enabling scale and spread of technology-enabled remote monitoring of blood pressure at home: findings from a rapid qualitative evaluation.

Frances Wu, Saoirse Moriarty, Hampton Toole, Joseph Wherton, Damon Mohebbi, James P Sheppard, Sara E Shaw, Sonja Marjanovic

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NIHR open research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Frances WuRAND Europe, Cambridge, England, CB2 8BF, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9951-6626
Saoirse MoriartyRAND Europe, Cambridge, England, CB2 8BF, UK.
Hampton TooleRAND Europe, Cambridge, England, CB2 8BF, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-7245-1759
Joseph WhertonUniversity of Oxford Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Oxford, England, OX2 6GG, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7701-4783
Damon MohebbiUniversity of Oxford Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Oxford, England, OX2 6GG, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9567-7193
James P SheppardUniversity of Oxford Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Oxford, England, OX2 6GG, UK.
Sara E ShawUniversity of Oxford Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Oxford, England, OX2 6GG, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7014-4793
Sonja MarjanovicRAND Europe, Cambridge, England, CB2 8BF, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6956-2007

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: High blood pressure (BP) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality. Blood pressure home monitoring improves blood pressure control, but there is limited evidence about the implementation of specifically 'technology-enabled' remote monitoring of blood pressure (TERM BP) at home. This evaluation aims to improve the evidence base on what constitutes TERM BP services, how they work, and what influences their implementation, impacts, spread, and scale. Methods: A multi-method, rapid qualitative evaluation involved four sites that implemented TERM BP. Across sites, we conducted interviews with staff (n = 35) and patients (n = 15) and analyzed key service documents. Three workshops with site staff, patients, and regional and national stakeholders helped refine the learning process. Thematic analysis and synthesis, and triangulation against existing literature, helped inform recommendations and was guided by the Non-adoption, Abandonment, and challenges to Scale-up, Spread and Sustainability of the technology framework. Patient and public voices informed the evaluation design and conduct. Results: TERM BP implementation varies in governance, patient eligibility, technology, workforce, and workflow. Perceived impacts include improved blood pressure control, case-finding, and a more efficient workload distribution. The parallel running of technology-enabled and paper-based pathways mitigates access inequalities, but involves a high administrative workload. Sociotechnical influences on implementation relate to technology user-friendliness and adaptability, health system relationships and resources, practice capabilities and learning cultures, and patient acceptability and enablement. Flexibility within a planned, gradual approach that embeds skills in teams and systems and impacts evidence generation support scale and spread. Conclusions: Technology and social forces co-evolve to shape TERM BP pathways and manage co-existing tensions, including planning, emergence, demand, and capacity. Decision makers should establish implementation guidance and commissioning criteria, address regulatory issues, and enable evidence generation and shared learning. Further research is needed on the impact of TERM BP, especially in integrated care and related to inequalities.

Indexed as

Primary care; hypertension; blood pressure; technology; self-monitoring; remote monitoring; qualitative; UK

Identifiers

PMID42368225
PMCPMC13294667

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.