ReviewGlobal health & medicine2026
Artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted diagnosis of skin diseases: From image classification to dermatology-specific multimodal clinical reasoning.
Review in Global health & medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) in dermatology has moved beyond the early paradigm of single-image classification. Dermatological diagnosis is achieved based on morphology, distribution, symptoms, tactile findings, temporal evolution, patient history, histopathology, and treatment response. Clinically important differentials, such as eczema versus psoriasis, cutaneous T-cell lymphoma versus chronic dermatitis, drug eruption versus viral exanthem, lupus erythematosus versus dermatomyositis, and melanoma versus atypical nevus, are rarely resolved with one photograph alone. This review therefore frames AI-assisted dermatology around a central argument: the field must progress from lesion recognition to dermatology-specific multimodal clinical reasoning. We summarize major advances in convolutional neural networks, dermoscopic benchmarks, clinical-image datasets, large language models, vision-language systems, and dermatology foundation models. We also analyze challenges that are particularly relevant to dermatology, including morphologic overlap, skin-tone bias, reduced erythema visibility on darker skin, dataset imbalance, variable smartphone imaging, imperfect reference standards, and the gap between benchmark performance and clinical deployment. Special attention is given to fairness, regulatory oversight, software as a medical device, human-AI collaboration, prognosis prediction, biologic-response modeling, longitudinal monitoring, and treatment optimization. Finally, we discuss future directions, including skin-tone-aware foundation models, lesion-level and body-site grounding, pathology-genomics integration, dermatology copilots, post-marketing surveillance, and prospective clinical trials. By prioritizing dermatological reasoning rather than generic AI architecture, this review outlines a clinically grounded pathway for building safe, interpretable, equitable, and useful AI systems for skin disease management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.