ArticleFrontiers in clinical diabetes and healthcare2026
The diabetes distress experience from the perspective of adolescents and their parents.
Article in Frontiers in clinical diabetes and healthcare, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To explore sources of diabetes distress (DD) and resources for mental health support for adolescents with type 1 diabetes (T1D) and their parents/guardians. Methods: We recruited adolescents with T1D and parents of adolescents with T1D using an explanatory sequential mixed methods design. Participants completed measures of DD for adolescents (Problem Areas in Diabetes-Teen, PAID-T) or parents (P-PAID-T), followed by separate focus groups that elicited information on common concerns related to living with T1D, types of mental and emotional support accessed, and additional support sources desired. Data were analyzed using an interpretive description approach and collaborative analysis techniques. Results: Six adolescents and five parents participated. All adolescents reported high levels of DD (median (IQR) PAID-T score 71 (59-86), cutoff ≥ 44), while most parents reported low levels of DD (P-PAID-T score 46 (35-66), cutoff ≥ 54). Across all focus groups, five themes were identified: DD can cause burnout and indifference; T1D disrupts activities of daily living; More peer support is desired; Society is unaware of how T1D is managed; and Concern about future financial burden. The parent focus groups also identified: Parental concerns around transfer of management of responsibilities to their children. Conclusion: An improved understanding of the key sources of DD and how they compare between adolescents and parents will facilitate the design of more effective mental health support interventions for T1D.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.