Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42368412›Full record

ReviewEuropean cardiology2026

Bidirectional Block Assessment Techniques During Cavotricuspid Isthmus Ablation: A Comprehensive Review.

Juan Ismael Almonte, Jesús Rodríguez-Silva, Julián Rodríguez-García, Paolo D Dallaglio, Rodolfo San Antonio, Marcos Rodríguez-García, Jordi Mercé, Javier Sanaú, Rubelin Mosquea, Andrea Di Marco and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Juan Ismael AlmonteCardiology Department, Bellvitge University Hospital, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-3438-6187
Jesús Rodríguez-SilvaCardiology Department, Bellvitge University Hospital, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3542-0457
Julián Rodríguez-GarcíaCardiology Department, Bellvitge University Hospital, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat Barcelona, Spain.
Paolo D DallaglioCardiology Department, Bellvitge University Hospital, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat Barcelona, Spain.
Rodolfo San AntonioCardiology Department, Bellvitge University Hospital, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat Barcelona, Spain.
Marcos Rodríguez-GarcíaCardiology Department, Bellvitge University Hospital, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat Barcelona, Spain.
Jordi MercéCardiology Department, Bellvitge University Hospital, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat Barcelona, Spain.
Javier SanaúCardiology Department, Bellvitge University Hospital, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat Barcelona, Spain.
Rubelin MosqueaCardiology Department, Bellvitge University Hospital, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat Barcelona, Spain.
Andrea Di MarcoCardiology Department, Bellvitge University Hospital, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat Barcelona, Spain.
Ignasi AngueraCardiology Department, Bellvitge University Hospital, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6988-3487

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ablation of common atrial flutter is one of the most commonly performed procedures in arrhythmia units worldwide. The most frequently used approach involves creating a radiofrequency ablation line between the tricuspid annulus and the inferior vena cava, at the level of the medial cavotricuspid isthmus. The generally accepted endpoint for this procedure is establishment of bidirectional block along this line. Since the late 1990s, various approaches have been used to confirm the presence of this block. However, most of the techniques discussed here have not been compared in large-scale studies. Instead, they are supported by small studies in a limited number of patients, making it difficult to assess the superiority of one technique over another. In addition, long-term follow-up data and recurrence rates are scarce. This comprehensive review presents an overview of the different techniques: we summarise the methodology, appropriate measurement procedures, degree of validity and potential pitfalls encountered in routine clinical practice. The accumulation of favourable results using a combination of different approaches increases the likelihood that the ablation line is electrically impermeable. Thus, we recommend familiarising oneself with all these methods and using multiple techniques to assess cavotricuspid isthmus ablation.

Indexed as

bidirectional blockCommon atrial flutterendpointinterpretationmanoeuvrespitfalls

Identifiers

PMID42368412
PMCPMC13294562

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.