ArticleEULAR rheumatology open2025
App-based exercise intervention versus supervised exercise therapy for patients with hip or knee osteoarthritis-the randomised noninferiority DigiOA trial.
Article in EULAR rheumatology open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Incorporating technology in the treatment of osteoarthritis is seen as a viable solution to preserve the sustainability of the healthcare system. We aimed to determine whether the use of an exercise app was noninferior to supervised exercise therapy in patients with hip/knee osteoarthritis. Methods: In this noninferiority randomised controlled trial, patients with hip/knee osteoarthritis in primary care physiotherapy in Norway were provided individually tailored exercise therapy for 6 weeks randomly assigned 1:1 to either in-person delivery (standard treatment) or delivery through an app (experimental treatment). Both groups received patient osteoarthritis education prior to randomisation. The primary outcome was the proportion of OMERACT-OARSI (Outcome Measures in Rheumatology-Osteoarthritis Research Society International) responders (change in pain, physical function, and disease activity) at 6 weeks postrandomisation. Results: Between July 2021 and December 2023, 103 patients were assessed for eligibility; 68 patients (43% of the calculated sample size) participated in patient education and were randomly allocated to the standard or the experimental group, resulting in 34 patients in each group. At 6 weeks, 53 (78%) reported on the primary outcome. Fifteen patients fulfilled the OMERACT-OARSI responder criteria, of which 7 were in the standard and 8 in the experimental treatment group, respectively. Risk difference between the groups was 0.03 (95% CI -0.22, 0.27). Conclusions: The results indicate a potential positive effect of app-based exercise at 6 weeks follow-up; however, we cannot conclude whether app-based exercise was noninferior to in-person supervised exercise therapy as the lower bound of the 95% confidence interval exceeded the noninferiority margin of 20%.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.