ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2026
Immune-Inflammatory markers and heart failure incidence and mortality: a population-based longitudinal study.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Inflammation is a crucial pathophysiological driver contributing to the initiation and perpetuation of heart failure (HF). This study conducted a rigorous comparison among six immune-inflammatory indices to evaluate their predictive role for HF incidence and subsequent mortality. Methods: We analyzed data from 415,263 participants free of HF and 1,952 patients with established HF from the UK Biobank. The markers assessed were the systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), systemic inflammation response index (SIRI), aggregate index of systemic inflammation (AISI), inflammatory burden index (IBI), C-reactive protein-albumin-lymphocyte (CALLY) index, and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR). The outcomes were incident HF and all-cause mortality among HF patients. Results: Elevated levels of SII, SIRI, AISI, IBI, and NLR showed significant, dose-response relationships with an enhanced likelihood of HF events. The IBI demonstrated the strongest association, with participants in the highest quintile having an 86% higher risk of HF than those in the lowest quintile (HR 1.86, 95% CI: 1.75-1.97). Conversely, a higher CALLY was associated with a lower risk of HF (HR for Q5 vs. Q1: 0.56, 95% CI: 0.53-0.60). Among HF patients, SIRI, AISI, IBI, and NLR had a positive correlation with all-cause mortality, whereas the CALLY was associated with improved survival (HR 0.81, 95% CI: 0.70-0.94). ROC analyses confirmed that IBI provided the superior predictive accuracy for both incident HF and mortality. Conclusion: Immune-inflammatory markers are significant predictors of HF incidence and prognosis. The IBI emerged as the most robust biomarker, underscoring its utility for risk stratification in primary and secondary HF prevention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.