Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42368848›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2026

Deep learning in the early diagnosis of acute aortic dissection.

Simon Eggleton, Jon Ryan, Blanca Gallego

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Simon EggletonCentre for Big Data Research in Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Jon RyanDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, NSW, Australia.
Blanca GallegoCentre for Big Data Research in Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review explores the potential of deep learning (DL) to enhance the diagnostic efficiency of acute aortic dissection (AAD), a life-threatening cardiovascular emergency characterised by high misdiagnosis rates. In contrast to a prior systematic review that evaluated DL approaches to aid diagnosis, this review focuses specifically on the early diagnostic phase, examining routinely available investigations, including the electrocardiogram, chest x-ray and tabular clinical data, to inform decisions regarding which patients should and should not proceed to advanced imaging. We analyse current diagnostic challenges contributing to AAD misdiagnosis and existing diagnostic decision support pathways. The review also examines healthcare data modalities and DL architectures capable of identifying complex patterns and relationships not readily recognised by clinicians. We summarise existing DL research in the early phase of AAD diagnosis aimed at improving diagnostic accuracy and offer insights into future research directions. Finally, challenges relevant to DL-based AAD diagnosis are discussed, including data scarcity, class imbalance due to its low prevalence, and the role of explainable AI.

Indexed as

acute aortic dissectionartificial intelligencedeep learningdiagnostic efficiencydiagnostic pathwaymachine learning

Identifiers

PMID42368848
PMCPMC13303851

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.