ReviewFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2026
Deep learning in the early diagnosis of acute aortic dissection.
Review in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This review explores the potential of deep learning (DL) to enhance the diagnostic efficiency of acute aortic dissection (AAD), a life-threatening cardiovascular emergency characterised by high misdiagnosis rates. In contrast to a prior systematic review that evaluated DL approaches to aid diagnosis, this review focuses specifically on the early diagnostic phase, examining routinely available investigations, including the electrocardiogram, chest x-ray and tabular clinical data, to inform decisions regarding which patients should and should not proceed to advanced imaging. We analyse current diagnostic challenges contributing to AAD misdiagnosis and existing diagnostic decision support pathways. The review also examines healthcare data modalities and DL architectures capable of identifying complex patterns and relationships not readily recognised by clinicians. We summarise existing DL research in the early phase of AAD diagnosis aimed at improving diagnostic accuracy and offer insights into future research directions. Finally, challenges relevant to DL-based AAD diagnosis are discussed, including data scarcity, class imbalance due to its low prevalence, and the role of explainable AI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.