SynthesisFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2026
Associated thromboembolic events to the post COVID syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has imposed a substantial worldwide health burden; a fraction of people develops post-COVID syndrome, in which symptoms persist long after the initial phase of infection. Although these individuals may be more susceptible to developing thromboembolic events, the extent and significance of this link remain uncertain. This systematic review and meta-analysis sought to explore the prevalence of thromboembolic events in people with post-COVID syndrome, therefore addressing knowledge gaps and providing critical information for therapeutic management. Methods: Following PRISMA principles, a thorough search across numerous databases-including Medline, Web of Science, Scopus, Dimensions, the Virtual Health Library, the British Library, and Google Scholars-was performed. Analytical cross-sectional, case-control, and cohort studies on individuals with post-COVID syndrome were considered eligible research. Meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.4.1, with a random-effects model providing hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for specific thromboembolic events. Results: The initial database search yielded 1,617 publications, 1,021 of which passed title and abstract screening after duplicates were removed. Following a full-text analysis of 83 publications, 20 met the inclusion criteria, with 5 included in the quantitative synthesis and 15 in the qualitative synthesis. Conclusion: Emphasizing ramifications for clinical therapy, particularly among vascular surgeons, this thorough review and meta-analysis exposes a significant thromboembolic risk among patients with post-COVID syndrome. The outcomes highlight the need for early detection, proactive monitoring, and tailored preventive treatments, including anticoagulant drugs. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42023441556, PROSPERO CRD42023441556.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.