ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Differences in hepatocyte-related indicators within occupational hazardous factor exposure between genders.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study examines how gender differences in exposure to workplace hazards affect liver function markers among manufacturing workers, particularly focusing on physical and chemical exposures such as organic solvents and heavy metals. Methods: The research draws on data from 1,554 manufacturing workers in China, sourced from the Occupational Health Information Registration System (OHIR). To account for confounding variables like age, body mass index (BMI), and exposure duration, propensity score matching (PSM) was employed. The final analysis involved a balanced sample of 752 workers (376 men and 376 women) to compare liver enzyme levels. Statistical tests, including t-tests, chi-square tests, and conditional logistic regression models, were applied to evaluate these differences. Results: The results revealed notable gender disparities in both occupational exposure and liver enzyme levels. Male workers were more likely to encounter physical hazards such as dust, heat, and noise, while female workers had a higher exposure to organic chemicals. In terms of liver function, males exhibited significantly higher levels of ALT, AST, GGT, and ALP, with the most marked differences observed in ALT, AST, and GGT levels. Conclusion: These findings underscore the necessity of factoring in gender when shaping occupational health policies. The study calls for gender-specific interventions to mitigate the risks to liver health, particularly in the manufacturing sector.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.