SynthesisFrontiers in public health2026
Levels of positive aspects of caregiving and associated factors among family caregivers of older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To systematically assess the levels of positive aspects of caregiving, measured by validated scales, and examine associated factors among family caregivers of older adults. Design: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods: PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, and Web of Science were searched from inception to 30 August 2025. Two reviewers conducted study selection, quality appraisal, data extraction, and data analysis. The mean scores of positive aspects of caregiving were synthesized using the random-effects model. Associated factors were summarized using the stress process model as the theoretical framework. Results: A total of 34 studies were included, involving 8,021 family caregivers from 12 countries. The pooled mean score for positive aspects of caregiving was 3.50 (95%CI = 3.32-3.67). Subgroup analyses showed lower positive aspects of caregiving in Asian and younger family caregivers. Associated factors included socio-demographic factors, primary stressors, secondary stressors, and social factors. Conclusion: Positive aspects of caregiving are at a moderate level among family caregivers of older adults and can be influenced by multifaceted factors. Healthcare professionals should develop support interventions based on modifiable factors to enhance positive aspects of caregiving and improve psychological health for family caregivers. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD420251154778.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.