Evidence mapPaperPMID 42369025Full record

ReviewRegenerative biomaterials2026

The next generation of alginate dressings: recent innovations for chronic wound healing.

Eduarda Pinto, Cristina C Barrias, Judite Novais Barbosa

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Regenerative biomaterials, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Eduarda PintoI3S-Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, Universidade do Porto, Porto 4200-125, Portugal.
Cristina C BarriasI3S-Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, Universidade do Porto, Porto 4200-125, Portugal.
Judite Novais BarbosaI3S-Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, Universidade do Porto, Porto 4200-125, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1852-2790

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic wounds remain a major clinical challenge with a huge associated socioeconomic burden. Therefore, multifunctional biomaterials that can simultaneously manage exudate, modulate inflammation, prevent infection and promote tissue regeneration are extremely needed. Alginate, a naturally derived and highly biocompatible polysaccharide, has long been used in the clinic for advanced wound care due to its intrinsic gel-forming ability and capacity to maintain a moist healing environment. However, commercially available products are primarily designed to absorb exudate and physically protect the wound, while offering limited support for other key therapeutic goals, including modulation of inflammation and stimulation of tissue repair and regeneration. This review highlights the most recent innovations aimed at enhancing alginate's therapeutic potential, either through physicochemical modifications of hydrogels or by expanding beyond traditional hydrogel formats into novel alginate architectures that offer improved tissue integration, tunability and controlled release of substances. The review also outlines synergistic formulations combining alginate with other biomaterials, bioactive molecules and cell-derived products to enhance its mechanical properties and antimicrobial performance, as well as to address immunomodulation and promote regeneration in chronic wounds. Together, these emerging approaches underscore alginate's versatility and potential as a multifunctional platform for next-generation chronic wound therapies.

Indexed as

alginatebioengineeringchronic woundsregenerationwound management

Identifiers

PMID42369025
PMCPMC13294454

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.