ArticleiScience2026
Violating statistical structure impairs detection of deviant and incidental events.
Article in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Learning about the statistical structure of our environment is thought to shape perception, but it is unclear how. A recent theory suggests that percepts are initially biased toward the expected, with particularly unexpected observations triggering reactive sensory gain increases-balancing requirements for fast and accurate perception alongside reliable sensory estimates for model updating. Six experiments tested this account, where participants detected visual stimuli on the circumference of, and at the center of, a circle. Circumference stimuli followed a spatial or orientation regularity, which then changed abruptly. Bayesian changepoint modeling showed that hit rates were lower for all events following such disruption of the learned probabilistic structure (hereafter "surprise"). Performance recovery after one change took several trials but became immediate when changes were more frequent. These findings suggest broad perceptual facilitation of the expected regardless of latency, and we thus consider how models may be accurately updated when the world changes, despite poorer perception.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.