Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42369147›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026

Detection of drug-induced acute respiratory distress syndrome risk signals in FAERS: a real-world pharmacovigilance study.

Yunhan Zhao, Feiyang Zhao, Haoxiang Hu, Jianghai He, Yiting Ni, Pingping Jin, Xiao Wang, Zheru Jin, Yiren Hu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yunhan Zhao *Department of Neurology, Postgraduate Training Base Alliance of Wenzhou Medical University (Wenzhou People's Hospital), Wenzhou, China.
Feiyang Zhao *Wenzhou Third Clinical Institute Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou People's Hospital, Wenzhou, China.
Haoxiang HuDepartment of Neurology, Postgraduate Training Base Alliance of Wenzhou Medical University (Wenzhou People's Hospital), Wenzhou, China.
Jianghai HeDepartment of Neurology, Postgraduate Training Base Alliance of Wenzhou Medical University (Wenzhou People's Hospital), Wenzhou, China.
Yiting NiWenzhou Third Clinical Institute Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou People's Hospital, Wenzhou, China.
Pingping JinWenzhou Third Clinical Institute Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou People's Hospital, Wenzhou, China.
Xiao WangWenzhou Third Clinical Institute Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou People's Hospital, Wenzhou, China.
Zheru Jin *Wenzhou Third Clinical Institute Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou People's Hospital, Wenzhou, China.
Yiren Hu *Wenzhou Third Clinical Institute Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou People's Hospital, Wenzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Drug-induced acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) represents an often overlooked yet potentially severe adverse reaction in clinical practice. Existing evidence predominantly stems from isolated case reports, and systematic investigations based on large-scale real-world data remain limited. This study aimed to comprehensively evaluate the risk signals of drug-related ARDS and identify potential high-risk drug classes using the US FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). Methods: We retrieved data from FAERS and extracted ARDS-related reports based on the MedDRA Preferred Terms (PT), followed by deduplication and data cleaning. Four disproportionality analysis methods were used to detect drug signals. LASSO regression and multivariable logistic regression were applied to identify potential independent risk factors. The time interval from drug exposure to ARDS onset was also assessed. Results: A total of 15,986 drug-related ARDS reports were included, with the highest proportion occurring in middle-aged and older adults, and slightly more cases in males than in females. The five most frequently reported drugs were mycophenolic acid, methotrexate, rituximab, tacrolimus, and amiodarone. Signal detection indicated strong associations for prednisone, mycophenolic acid, amiodarone, and cytarabine. Multivariable analyses further identified 22 drugs significantly associated with ARDS risk. The median time to ARDS onset was 30 days, and approximately 75% of cases occurred within 150 days after treatment initiation. Conclusion: Using real-world data, this study identified multiple drug classes with significantly elevated ARDS risk, including immunosuppressants, antineoplastic agents, glucocorticoids, cardiovascular drugs, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). These findings provide important evidence for clinical monitoring of high-risk medications.

Indexed as

adverse eventsARDSdisproportionality analysisFAERSpharmacovigilance

Identifiers

PMID42369147
PMCPMC13294336

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.