ReviewNeuroscience of consciousness2026
I sync, therefore I am: brain-body synchrony in typical and disordered consciousness.
Review in Neuroscience of consciousness, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Consciousness is often treated as a property of the brain alone, yet accumulating evidence suggests that it is shaped by a recurrent dialogue between the brain and body. In this review, we discuss how cognition associated with consciousness-processes that define the observer, their observations, and arising qualia-depend on structured rhythmic correspondences between bodily rhythms and brain signals. We first review how cardiac, respiratory, and gastric rhythms modulate neuroelectric and neurovascular fluctuations in support of interoception-perception of the bodily state-and functionally related faculties such as emotion and selfhood, which draw upon interoceptive representations. We then discuss how clinical and subclinical conditions are associated with dysrhythmia in underlying bodily rhythms and atypical increases or decreases in a bodily rhythm's modulation of brain processes. Across bodily systems, an emergent pattern suggests both an optimal window of brain-body synchrony, beyond which adverse effects are likely to occur, and that non-clinical, stress-related increases in brain-body synchrony may promote the utility of bodily rhythms for coordinating disparate entrained cognitive systems to facilitate functions such as multisensory integration. We conclude that these converging lines of research support a categorical difference between an embodied agent and the proverbial brain-in-a-vat because disturbing bodily rhythms or their coupling to the brain alters phenomenological experience-at times to such a degree as to warrant labeling the resulting states as meeting clinical criteria.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.